Linux Compiler Benchmarks Of LLVM Clang 3.5 vs. LLVM Clang 3.6-rc1
Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 25 January 2015. Page 3 of 3. 3 Comments

Compile times were a little slower under Clang 3.6 than Clang 3.5, but we'll see how things pan out by the final release next month.

There was some fluctuation in other C/C++ benchmarks, but it's difficult to call anything definitively due to the margins and only testing from this single Xeon Haswell system.

MP3 encoding was close but leaning slightly in favor of Clang 3.6

HINT and Apache ended out my round of weekend Clang benchmarks by showing some nice performance improvements over Clang 3.5. The raw results in full can be analyzed via this OpenBenchmarking.org result file. As the LLVM/Clang 3.6 release approaches toward the end of February, I'll be back with more compiler benchmarks across a range of Linux systems.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Author picture

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.

Trending Linux News