AMD EPYC 7642 Benchmarks: The Rome 48 Core CPU That Easily Takes On Intel's Xeon Platinum 8280

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 20 September 2019 at 10:20 AM EDT. Page 2 of 8. 5 Comments.
AMD EPYC 7302 / 7402 / 7502 / 7642 / 7742 2P vs. Xeon Benchmarks

Starting the benchmarking roundabout with NAMD, the EPYC 7642 in both 1P and 2P configurations fits as it should within the EPYC Rome line-up. Interesting to note is that the EPYC 7642 was faster than the Xeon Platinum 8280 for NAMD both in single and dual CPU configurations.

AMD EPYC 7302 / 7402 / 7502 / 7642 / 7742 2P vs. Xeon Benchmarks

With John The Ripper that scales very well with OpenMP, the 48 core / 96 thread EPYC 7642 nearly ties the dual Xeon Platinum 8280 with its combined 56 cores / 112 threads. Interestingly in this workload, the EPYC 7642 also nearly matches the previous-generation EPYC 7601 2P.

AMD EPYC 7302 / 7402 / 7502 / 7642 / 7742 2P vs. Xeon Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302 / 7402 / 7502 / 7642 / 7742 2P vs. Xeon Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302 / 7402 / 7502 / 7642 / 7742 2P vs. Xeon Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302 / 7402 / 7502 / 7642 / 7742 2P vs. Xeon Benchmarks

Even with Intel's own MKL-DNN deep learning benchmark that leverages their Math Kernel Library (MKL), the EPYC 7642 does a good job competing with the Xeon Platinum 8280.


Related Articles