EXT4, Btrfs, XFS & F2FS On Linux 4.6 Through 4.9
Written by Michael Larabel in Storage on 17 December 2016. Page 4 of 4. 15 Comments

Interestingly for the BlogBench read test, EXT4 is noticeably slower than the other tested file-systems.

But for write performance, EXT4 is on top with BlogBench while XFS was in last place.

EXT4 was in front for CompileBench while Btrfs fell to last place.

PostMark isn't the most reliable disk benchmark and is fsync happy, but for this case anyhow F2FS came out in front.

Those wanting to dig through more of this performance data can see this OpenBenchmarking.org result file. Overall, not too many surprises. I'll be adding in Linux 4.10 data points once the merge window closes. I'll also be doing some more tests shortly with Linux SSD NVMe storage.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Author picture

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.

Trending Linux News