Initial Benchmarks Of Schedutil Performance On Linux 5.7 Show Room Still For Improvement

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 17 April 2020. Page 7 of 7. 11 Comments

The performance losses are tough, but at least using Schedutil can help with lower CPU power consumption:

When looking at the CPU package power consumption, using Schedutil had a lower power draw than even powersave while often leading to better results than powersave. Schedutil led to 15% on average lower CPU power consumption than the performance governor or 8% for this particular CPU setup.

The lower CPU power consumption also led to a slightly lower CPU operating temperature.

If taking the geometric mean of all the benchmarks, Schedutil still shows that it has a ways to go in being more competitive against the optimal performance choice.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Author picture

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via TwitterLinkedIn,> or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.