Intel Lunar Lake vs. AMD Strix Point Platform Profile Performance Comparison

Written by Michael Larabel in Computers on 16 October 2024 at 11:30 AM EDT. Page 3 of 6. 8 Comments.
GIMP benchmark with settings of Test: resize. Ryzen AI 9 365: performance was the fastest.
GIMP benchmark with settings of Test: resize. Ryzen AI 9 365: performance was the fastest.
GIMP benchmark with settings of Test: rotate. Core Ultra 7 256V: performance was the fastest.
GIMP benchmark with settings of Test: rotate. Core Ultra 7 256V: performance was the fastest.

The power profile with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ASUS laptop saw slightly better performance in the "performance" mode while the Core Ultra 7 256V numbers between balance_performance and performance were flat -- potentially due to the "Whisper" mode noted at the beginning of the article. In the power profile, both laptops saw much slower performance but with much greater power efficiency. In the case of the Core Ultra 7 256V it was running these workloads at around 3 Watts.

RawTherapee benchmark with settings of Total Benchmark Time. Ryzen AI 9 365: performance was the fastest.
RawTherapee benchmark with settings of Total Benchmark Time. Ryzen AI 9 365: performance was the fastest.

Or with the demanding RawTherapee RAW imaging program, the power profile led the Lunar Lake laptop to a 4.8 Watt average compared to 15 Watts while the Ryzen AI 9 365 went from 18 Watts down to 9 Watts.

Chaos Group V-RAY benchmark with settings of Mode: CPU. Ryzen AI 9 365: balance_performance was the fastest.
Chaos Group V-RAY benchmark with settings of Mode: CPU. Ryzen AI 9 365: balance_performance was the fastest.
Chaos Group V-RAY benchmark with settings of Mode: CPU. Ryzen AI 9 365: balance_performance was the fastest.

For demanding multi-threaded creator applications, the power profile still led to the best performance-per-Watt but the higher core/thread counts on the Ryzen AI 9 365 allowed it to yield better efficiency over the Lunar Lake SoC.

IndigoBench benchmark with settings of Acceleration: CPU, Scene: Supercar. Ryzen AI 9 365: balance_performance was the fastest.
IndigoBench benchmark with settings of Acceleration: CPU, Scene: Supercar. Ryzen AI 9 365: balance_performance was the fastest.
IndigoBench benchmark with settings of Acceleration: CPU, Scene: Supercar. Ryzen AI 9 365: balance_performance was the fastest.
IndigoBench benchmark with settings of Acceleration: CPU, Scene: Bedroom. Ryzen AI 9 365: balance_performance was the fastest.
IndigoBench benchmark with settings of Acceleration: CPU, Scene: Bedroom. Ryzen AI 9 365: balance_performance was the fastest.
IndigoBench benchmark with settings of Acceleration: CPU, Scene: Bedroom. Ryzen AI 9 365: balance_performance was the fastest.

In any event for those trying to be productive on the road or otherwise running on battery power, the "power" profile led to a nice bump in performance-per-Watt.

Related Articles