Intel Xeon 6980P vs. AMD EPYC Power Efficiency / Performance-Per-Watt Benchmarks

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 26 September 2024 at 01:52 PM EDT. Page 5 of 7. 21 Comments.
NWChem benchmark with settings of Input: C240 Buckyball. EPYC 9684X 2P was the fastest.
NWChem benchmark with settings of Input: C240 Buckyball. EPYC 9684X 2P was the fastest.
Xcompact3d Incompact3d benchmark with settings of Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d. Xeon 6980P 2P was the fastest.
Xcompact3d Incompact3d benchmark with settings of Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d. Xeon 6980P 2P was the fastest.
BRL-CAD benchmark with settings of VGR Performance Metric. Xeon 6980P 2P was the fastest.
BRL-CAD benchmark with settings of VGR Performance Metric. Xeon 6980P 2P was the fastest.
BRL-CAD benchmark with settings of VGR Performance Metric. Xeon 6980P 2P was the fastest.

As expected given the increase to the default TDP, there is a clear increase in CPU power consumption with this flagship Granite Rapids server processor SKU but at least it makes for a nice boost to the performance.

OpenFOAM benchmark with settings of Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size, Execution Time. Xeon 6980P 2P was the fastest.
OpenFOAM benchmark with settings of Input: drivaerFastback, Medium Mesh Size, Execution Time. Xeon 6980P 2P was the fastest.

In cases like OpenFOAM CFD, the average power consumption of the Xeon 6980P 2P was just a ~6% increase over the EPYC 9684X 2P.

Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: Barbershop, Compute: CPU-Only. Xeon 6980P 2P was the fastest.
Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: Barbershop, Compute: CPU-Only. Xeon 6980P 2P was the fastest.

Or around a 14% increase in average power use while running Blender.

Related Articles