Google Axion CPU With GCE C4A vs. AWS Graviton4 Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 8 November 2024 at 09:00 AM EST. Page 4 of 4. 4 Comments.
GROMACS benchmark with settings of Implementation: MPI CPU, Input: water_GMX50_bare. C4A Axion highmem was the fastest.
RocksDB benchmark with settings of Test: Random Read. C4A Axion was the fastest.
RocksDB benchmark with settings of Test: Update Random. R8g.12xlarge Graviton4 was the fastest.
RocksDB benchmark with settings of Test: Read While Writing. R8g.12xlarge Graviton4 was the fastest.
RocksDB benchmark with settings of Test: Read Random Write Random. R8g.12xlarge Graviton4 was the fastest.

Overall it was a great showing for Google Axion with the C4A up against Graviton4 in Amazon's EC2 cloud. Those wanting to go through all the raw benchmarks in full can find the data via this result page where you can also compare the performance per dollar per hour and similar based upon your local/available pricing, etc.

Geometric Mean Of All Test Results benchmark with settings of Result Composite, Google Axion C4A vs. AWS Graviton4 Benchmarks. C4A Axion was the fastest.

Across the few dozen benchmarks conducted, while both Graviton4 and Axion are based on the Neoverse-V2 design, the C4A instance at 48 vCPUs was about 10% faster than the 48 vCPU Graviton4 instance using the r8g.12xlarge type.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.

Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.