AMD Ryzen AI 300 Series Dominates Intel Core Ultra 7 Lunar Lake Performance For Linux Developers & Creators

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 4 October 2024 at 01:30 PM EDT. Page 5 of 9. 37 Comments.
OpenRadioss benchmark with settings of Model: Cell Phone Drop Test. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.
OpenRadioss benchmark with settings of Model: Chrysler Neon 1M. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.
Pennant benchmark with settings of Test: leblancbig. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.
Xcompact3d Incompact3d benchmark with settings of Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction. Ryzen AI 9 365 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.

For any multi-threaded workloads, the Lunar Lake performance was uncompetitive with just being eight cores and half of those being low-power E cores.

XNNPACK benchmark with settings of Model: FP32MobileNetV2. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.
XNNPACK benchmark with settings of Model: FP32MobileNetV3Large. Ryzen AI 9 365 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.
XNNPACK benchmark with settings of Model: FP16MobileNetV2. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.
XNNPACK benchmark with settings of Model: FP16MobileNetV3Large. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.
XNNPACK benchmark with settings of Model: FP16MobileNetV3Small. Ryzen AI 9 365 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.
XNNPACK benchmark with settings of Model: QU8MobileNetV2. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.

For AVX-512 libraries and workloads, Lunar Lake at times was behind the Core i7 1185G7 Tigerlake for raw performance.

NAMD benchmark with settings of Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.
NAMD benchmark with settings of Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.
NAMD benchmark with settings of Input: STMV with 1,066,628 Atoms. Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 - ASUS Zenbook S 16 was the fastest.

The Core Ultra 7 256V is an improvement over prior generation Intel mobile CPUs for power efficiency, but in the multi-threaded workloads the performance-per-Watt was behind the AMD Ryzen AI 300 laptops tested.

Related Articles
Google Axion CPU With GCE C4A vs. AWS Graviton4 Performance
NVIDIA GH200 Grace CPU vs. AMD EPYC 9005 Turin CPU Performance
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Linux Performance: Zen 5 With 3D V-Cache
Power Determinism Mode Still Proves Beneficial For AMD EPYC 9005 Performance
AMD EPYC 9655 Benchmarks Show The Terrific Generational Gains With 5th Gen EPYC
Benchmarks Of Google's Axion Arm-based CPU: Competitive Performance & Compelling Value