8 vs. 12 Channel DDR5-6000 Memory Performance With AMD 5th Gen EPYC

Written by Michael Larabel in Memory on 20 November 2024 at 11:40 AM EST. Page 6 of 7. 29 Comments.
Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: BMW27, Compute: CPU-Only. 8c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.
Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: Classroom, Compute: CPU-Only. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.
Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: Fishy Cat, Compute: CPU-Only. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.
Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: Barbershop, Compute: CPU-Only. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.
Blender benchmark with settings of Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona, Compute: CPU-Only. 8c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

Blender for CPU-based 3D modeling wasn't yielding any faster renders when going from 8 x DDR5-6000 to 12 x DDR5-6000 memory on this EPYC Turin Supermicro server.

Apache HTTP Server benchmark with settings of Concurrent Requests: 500. 12c DDR5-6000 was the fastest.

The Apache HTTP web server saw slightly better performance out of the four additional memory channels.

Related Articles
Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 32GB Kit Performance With Intel Arrow Lake
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Linux Memory DDR5 Performance Testing
AMD EPYC 9755 DDR5-4800 vs. DDR5-6000 Memory Performance
MRDIMM 8800MT/s vs. DDR5-6400 Memory Performance With Intel Xeon 6
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X DDR5-6000 / DDR5-6400 / DDR5-8000 Memory Performance
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X Performance With DDR5-8000