GCC is definitely good, but sometimes CLANG/LLVM produces better code for me...
My application is not 'typical', but is some carefully...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Search Result
Collapse
9 results in 0.0147 seconds.
Keywords
Members
Tags
-
Minor correction about what GPL really says about 'making code public'
It is not true that GPLed code needing to be made...
Leave a comment:
-
When doing commercial development (from the user standpoint, not the compiler developer), I started (about 2yrs ago) doing compiles on all of LLVM, GCC...
Leave a comment:
-
(Sorry if a similar reply is already seen)
If you are a business and purchase 'GPL support' with updated binaries/source, you have NO business...
Leave a comment:
-
I have to admit that Linux partially took off because of a few reasons -- personality cult (to an extent), and also idealism about GPL. The idealism...
Leave a comment:
-
If I am an ongoing business not involved with 'e.g. compiler development', I won't redistribute the source/binary given to me -- no need to. I am just...
Leave a comment:
-
Using the term 'anarchy' is not really helpful. The opposite of anarchy (like GPL?) is totalitarianism? Perhaps extreme socialism? Let's not use...
Leave a comment:
-
HOWEVER, IN THE COPYLEFT CASE YOU NEED NOT GIVE BACK TO THE PROJECT, BUT JUST TO THOSE WHO YOU GIVE BINARIES!!! Remember: the original GPL is mostly...
Leave a comment:
-
LLVM is a reasonable alternative to GCC for various purposes
I agree... Once a project gains a certain size on the net, it is unlikely...
Leave a comment:
Bottom Ad
Collapse
Leave a comment: