Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Search Result
Collapse
22 results in 0.0156 seconds.
Keywords
Members
Tags
-
Just waiting for the other shoe to drop. Our older branch, with a somewhat optimized fsync was independently tested here: http://www.spinics.net/list...
-
Incorrect, you will get long term fragmentation and run a bit slower, but still fast most probably. It actually takes a lot of churn to age a filesystem...
Leave a comment:
-
-
Tux3 is very different from Btrfs, I don't know where you got that from. Btrfs uses a "shared tree" design similar to Tux2 from back in 1998...
Leave a comment:
-
We appreciate Dave's review, but the tone of it falls short of collegial or professional....
Leave a comment:
-
It is only fair to point out that Dave Chinner is lead developer for the XFS filesystem, not exactly an impartial observer....
Leave a comment:
-
The story on network transparency is still unsatisfying
Basically, the story from the Wayland team remains "we already broke network...
Leave a comment:
-
Read the mails yourself, and notice the simple fact that all three filesystems ran exactly the same perfectly valid benchmark. I think you owe me an ...
Leave a comment:
-
The reason why Tux3 beats Tmpfs in this particular benchmark (dbench) is explained in the post. It is because Tux3 is able to offload some of the delete...
Leave a comment:
-
That's a deep question which has been extensively addressed in various posts. See here:
http://phunq.net/pipermail/tux3/
...
Leave a comment:
Bottom Ad
Collapse
Leave a comment: