Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FLANG: NVIDIA Brings Fortran To LLVM

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lucasbekker
    replied
    Having worked with some "old farts" at universities, the only real argument FOR Fortran that I have come across is the usual one for any legacy product. They don't have the time or motivation to port their code to C (or something else). The argument that Fortran is inherently better for these kind of scientific applications doesn't really convince me, as I have seen no real example that demonstrates this.
    It is nice to see any kind of open source effort on this front. But in the long run, I think it would be better if the applications would be ported to a language that doesn't discourage new developers to contribute.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dawn
    replied
    Originally posted by droidhacker View Post
    Fortran? Really? The three people who still use that are enough to justify this?
    Fortran is extremely common in HPC. The language regularly receives updates, and for array programming is one of the very best options available. Intel, IBM, and Nvidia all continue to put significant resources into their fast Fortran compilers.

    Leave a comment:


  • adakite
    replied
    Originally posted by droidhacker View Post
    Fortran? Really? The three people who still use that are enough to justify this?
    It seems that you don't realize how important is this language in HPC/Science (earth science, climate, astronomy and many others). It has been designed quite a long time ago, but like the wheels on your car it's damn good at what is it used for: computation. This is why Intel, AMD, Nvidia are spending ressources for this language.

    Back to the news, this is a good step from nvidia, PGI compilers are pretty messy unlike Intel's.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ehvis
    replied
    Originally posted by droidhacker View Post
    Fortran? Really? The three people who still use that are enough to justify this?
    Kudos for the demonstration in ignorance.

    Fortran is still very big. Especially in areas of science where codebases are used that have been in continuous development since the 1960s.

    Leave a comment:


  • L_A_G
    replied
    As far as I'm aware most people who still use Fortran are old farts who work in university physics departments (I've personally run into a few of them and I've heard that there's a lot of them all over the world). Physics is one of the major users of high performance compute so it's only natural that this would be added at some point. Nvidia's version of GCC, the "imaginatively" named NVCC, has had support for Fortran for as long as I've known about it, so I'd say that the only thing resembling a surprise here is that Nvidia would be supporting a competing compiler.

    Leave a comment:


  • droidhacker
    replied
    Fortran? Really? The three people who still use that are enough to justify this?

    Leave a comment:


  • phoronix
    started a topic FLANG: NVIDIA Brings Fortran To LLVM

    FLANG: NVIDIA Brings Fortran To LLVM

    Phoronix: FLANG: NVIDIA Brings Fortran To LLVM

    Flang is to Fortran as Clang is to C/C++...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
Working...
X