Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Open-Source .NET Fans Push Its New Foundation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Open-Source .NET Fans Push Its New Foundation

    Phoronix: Open-Source .NET Fans Push Its New Foundation

    This year at Microsoft's Build Developer Conference a .NET Foundation was announced to steward the "open-source technologies for .NET" While many open-source fans aren't too enthusiastic about .NET in any capacity, the .NET Foundation is beginning to move forward...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    C++11 and Qt5 anyday over .NET/Java/etc.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by jrch2k8 View Post
      C++11 and Qt5 anyday over .NET/Java/etc.
      I'm trying to find a purpose to your post other than starting a flamewar and I cannot see any.

      No substance or arguments (as this debate could ever be constructive anyway), just blind pushing of your own preferences.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by jrch2k8 View Post
        C++11 and Qt5 anyday over .NET/Java/etc.
        Really? How about Go + QML?

        Comment


        • #5
          I'll have to agree with ClosureSpin on this one. There is nothing that is
          inherently wrong/right with .NET and/or C#. It certainly has its merits,
          and the documentation is unprecedented, not to mention developer cost.
          Opensource does not have to use assembler to be opensource

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by clavko View Post
            I'll have to agree with ClosureSpin on this one. There is nothing that is
            inherently wrong/right with .NET and/or C#. It certainly has its merits,
            and the documentation is unprecedented, not to mention developer cost.
            Opensource does not have to use assembler to be opensource
            Jerkass Has a Point though. WinForms on Linux is still a mess.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by somini View Post
              Jerkass Has a Point though. WinForms on Linux is still a mess.
              Then use GTK# or Xwt or in the near future QtSharp. Given how easy C# makes separating your core from your UIs, if a project is open source it's kind of silly to whine about GUI toolkits. I personally look forward to mixing C# and Qt/QML though.

              Comment


              • #8
                At least the DotNetFoundation forums are running Discourse. Crufty old PHP-based forums with 90's UX (like this one) give me hives.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I love C# and .NET, it is awesome!

                  I also code in Java, Python, PHP, etc. But C# is my favorite language.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by somini View Post
                    Jerkass Has a Point though. WinForms on Linux is still a mess.
                    Agreed, but as someone said, there is GTK# and others. Also, GUI is a very small part
                    of .NET framework, there is a plethora of great, useable libraries.

                    Finally, somehow I think him mentioning .NET and Java together and comparing them
                    to Qt has something to do with their VM "heritage", rather than GUI. But I might be wrong.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X