Open-Source .NET Fans Push Its New Foundation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67113

    Open-Source .NET Fans Push Its New Foundation

    Phoronix: Open-Source .NET Fans Push Its New Foundation

    This year at Microsoft's Build Developer Conference a .NET Foundation was announced to steward the "open-source technologies for .NET" While many open-source fans aren't too enthusiastic about .NET in any capacity, the .NET Foundation is beginning to move forward...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • jrch2k8
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 2095

    #2
    C++11 and Qt5 anyday over .NET/Java/etc.

    Comment

    • ClosureSpin
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2014
      • 12

      #3
      Originally posted by jrch2k8 View Post
      C++11 and Qt5 anyday over .NET/Java/etc.
      I'm trying to find a purpose to your post other than starting a flamewar and I cannot see any.

      No substance or arguments (as this debate could ever be constructive anyway), just blind pushing of your own preferences.

      Comment

      • Drago
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 799

        #4
        Originally posted by jrch2k8 View Post
        C++11 and Qt5 anyday over .NET/Java/etc.
        Really? How about Go + QML?

        Comment

        • clavko
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2008
          • 171

          #5
          I'll have to agree with ClosureSpin on this one. There is nothing that is
          inherently wrong/right with .NET and/or C#. It certainly has its merits,
          and the documentation is unprecedented, not to mention developer cost.
          Opensource does not have to use assembler to be opensource

          Comment

          • somini
            Phoronix Member
            • Jan 2014
            • 53

            #6
            Originally posted by clavko View Post
            I'll have to agree with ClosureSpin on this one. There is nothing that is
            inherently wrong/right with .NET and/or C#. It certainly has its merits,
            and the documentation is unprecedented, not to mention developer cost.
            Opensource does not have to use assembler to be opensource
            Jerkass Has a Point though. WinForms on Linux is still a mess.

            Comment

            • Luke_Wolf
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2011
              • 2792

              #7
              Originally posted by somini View Post
              Jerkass Has a Point though. WinForms on Linux is still a mess.
              Then use GTK# or Xwt or in the near future QtSharp. Given how easy C# makes separating your core from your UIs, if a project is open source it's kind of silly to whine about GUI toolkits. I personally look forward to mixing C# and Qt/QML though.

              Comment

              • jokeyrhyme
                Phoronix Member
                • Aug 2010
                • 58

                #8
                At least the DotNetFoundation forums are running Discourse. Crufty old PHP-based forums with 90's UX (like this one) give me hives.

                Comment

                • uid313
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2011
                  • 6914

                  #9
                  I love C# and .NET, it is awesome!

                  I also code in Java, Python, PHP, etc. But C# is my favorite language.

                  Comment

                  • clavko
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 171

                    #10
                    Originally posted by somini View Post
                    Jerkass Has a Point though. WinForms on Linux is still a mess.
                    Agreed, but as someone said, there is GTK# and others. Also, GUI is a very small part
                    of .NET framework, there is a plethora of great, useable libraries.

                    Finally, somehow I think him mentioning .NET and Java together and comparing them
                    to Qt has something to do with their VM "heritage", rather than GUI. But I might be wrong.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X