Rustls Multi-Threaded Performance Is Battering OpenSSL

[bacteriamanicure]

Hahahahaha! Slavery? You mean like every last civilization on the planet has practiced? Like the Middle-East and China still practice? Or did you just mean the under a hundred years that the US practiced it before shedding millions of lives worth of blood abolishing it?

And that, my friends, is how you spot someone who was indoctrinated rather than educated.

And would you consider chinese slavery good or bad?

[fotomar]

I don't think anything I said refute what was written there. In fact, I pretty much said exactly the same. I still think this person did a pretty dumb choice to refuse to address the ultimatum. There's more important fight to win, and he could have made his point better, and rally people in his side instead.

Because of the whole absurd mess, we lost a productive volunteer.

We are all worse off for this CoCC’s actions, why should he be fighting a fabricated social issue while he’s also trying to contribute technically, of his own goodwill?

Thats just not how the real word works

[bacteriamanicure]

And would you consider chinese slavery good or bad?

Also lmao at ignoring the second half of the 13th amendment

[bacteriamanicure]

Okay, I'll give you that one. It was funny. *hat tip*

It is worth taking a look at the people who insist on calling it twitter and the people who insist on calling it x
As much as I framed it as a joke it is a rather difficult thing for you to think about without it becoming a counterexample

[TheMightyBuzzard]

And would you consider chinese slavery good or bad?

Silly question. I consider it quite bad. Which is why I take pride in the US having a shorter history of it than pretty much any nation that ever existed during the times it was the norm.

[Raka555]

image.png
Made me think of this ...

[bacteriamanicure]

Silly question. I consider it quite bad. Which is why I take pride in the US having a shorter history of it than pretty much any nation that ever existed during the times it was the norm.

And do you believe funding something makes you responsible for its consequences?
And also have you read the rest of the 13th amendment?

[TheMightyBuzzard]

It is worth taking a look at the people who insist on calling it twitter and the people who insist on calling it x
As much as I framed it as a joke it is a rather difficult thing for you to think about without it becoming a counterexample

Near as I can tell there are four groups. There's the types who think calling Trump "Drumpf" and X "Twitter" are somehow zings. There are the types who are Musk fanbois. There are those who don't care enough to remember it got renamed. And there is my camp who just refuse to change out of bloody-minded stubbornness.

It's not hard to think about. Self-evaluation is way harder and I do that all the time. Which is why it's so easy to avoid picking someone's team and mindlessly following. Well, that and it just suits my Gen-X mindset better to sit on the couch and make fun of all flavors of stupidity.

[DumbFsck]

It's very obvious to anyone who isn't drinking the Kool-Aid and rabidly attacking anyone who points out the big box of cyanide in the kitchen.

As a neutral, I'm pretty sure "rabidly attacking" is much more often done by "those not drinking the kool-aid".

Every single woke ideal/policy is designed to fragment Western society. Every last one. There isn't a single one that doesn't or that produces anything that works to further these societies.

This I absolutely disagree with, so I'd first ask you specifically what defines "woke ideal/policy", as in, what criteria have to be met so you include in this list. Because to say that every single one is against western society values means we have different definitions, either there or in what constitute "western society". Some examples of policy that I consider "woke" and at the same time beneficial to everyone, even anti-woke people, include being against segregation, affordable housing programmes (Austria has a few shining examples), in America I like how CA mandated companies to offer paid family leave (and ofc I think the father being home is as important as the mother for the children, and having properly cared for children seems to me like a good societal ideal), a lot of environmental measures are labeled as "woke" and a lot of them I judge as good policy (although I do judge a few of them too much or unrealistic or sometimes just for show/rhetorical/masturbatory), a lot of justice system reform in America is also "woke" and needed, body cameras for police is a good example, accountability is nice. Of course there is more, I'm European and have spoken in this forum about gun regulations, I'm pro civilian armament but also think there should be more control than what some US states do.

Omissions from the list does not mean the omitted policies are not indirectly or directly beneficial to you or society, I only gave those listed as examples because they are low hanging fruit we can all agree with.

Do you disagree those are beneficial to society? Or do they not fit in your definition of "woke"?

Therefore the only explanation for them is they aren't designed to further society but to fragment and destroy it. The support of mass immigration from failed, violent cultures without attempting to have the immigrants adapt to Western culture (instead of the other way around) should have been a major clue.

Do you have examples of western societies that had to adapt to the "undesirable" immigrant's culture?

I do agree that there are good and bad immigrants, and that accepting the local culture and integrating with the local society are necessary (but not sufficient) for someone to be a "good immigrant", I myself have lived in many countries, but always tried to integrate as much as possible. What I disagree is that I've never seen locals being made to change their way of life to that of the immigrant - to be extreme: I haven't seen an European country adopting sharia law (exaggerating for the sake of argument).

Do you have examples of society being changed for the worse through policy that was changed because or for the benefit of immigrants as opposed to locals? I don't mean facilitating immigration, or how "bad" or "good" the change in demographics in itself are, I mean changes in law that makes the host country more similar to the immigrant's country.

[TheMightyBuzzard]

And do you believe funding something makes you responsible for its consequences?
And also have you read the rest of the 13th amendment?

Oh, you're wanting to catch me in a "your government funded evil crap, so you're evil" kind of thing? No, I hate my government plenty. Your team is just the more insane side at the moment or you'd think I was with you.

I've read every amendment. And the unamended document. Many times. And every time I do I wonder anew if I could talk Congress out of a Letter of Marque, so I could take up the life of a privateer.