Rustls Multi-Threaded Performance Is Battering OpenSSL

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • patrick1946
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2021
    • 368

    #51
    Originally posted by TheMightyBuzzard

    What is wrong is a bunch of people looking to destroy Western society are playing an idiotic pronoun game to drive a wedge between people and set them at each other's throats. If that weren't the case, pronouns would be superfluous as you could simply add Mr/Ms/Mrs before your name and eliminate all confusion.
    Ms is nowadays seen as an insult in my culture. And there are other cultures too.

    And I am not so sure what you mean by western society. One of the most influential streams of western culture were enlightenment and liberalism.

    Comment

    • ahrs
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2021
      • 587

      #52
      How does performance compare to GNUTLS I wonder? On my Gentoo system I always try to use GNUTLS when I can and I made it the default TLS provider for Curl.

      Comment

      • bacteriamanicure
        Phoronix Member
        • Feb 2024
        • 68

        #53
        Originally posted by TheMightyBuzzard

        What is wrong is a bunch of people looking to destroy Western society are playing an idiotic pronoun game to drive a wedge between people and set them at each other's throats. If that weren't the case, pronouns would be superfluous as you could simply add Mr/Ms/Mrs before your name and eliminate all confusion.
        Most well adjusted Rust hater

        Comment

        • DumbFsck
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2023
          • 345

          #54
          Originally posted by fotomar View Post

          Nobody seems to be refuting it with actual evidence
          But it is easily agreeable that the first hand account is biased, right? Three sides to the story, his side, the foundation side (his sponsor) and, the truth.

          Regardless, what I take the most issue in all this hubbub is people saying Tomazo was "banned", as he wasn't and is welcome to participate through some other sponsor.

          And I mildly agree with (or better yet, I understand) his sponsor dropping him, simply due to the unfortunate truth that optics matter and sponsoring him might aytribute "bad" labels to them - even if whatever accusation is unfounded. This has happened a lot with the "me too" movement, you don't want your org to be accused of enabling sexual predators or Anti-Semites or whatever else, and as people say "a lie can make it around the world while the truth is tying its shoelaces".

          After bad PR goes away, no issue in taking home back tho - since ot seems to be unfounded.




          Linguistically I think this is all very interesting. A very American thing.

          In Germany you can't do anything remotely anti-semite or nazi in appearance, you have to change logos, phrasing etc, if you get caught throwing a salute the police will at the very least ask you some questions. (All of this changed slightly in recent years, and there is some imagery and rhetoric that some pro Russian groups used that would not fly a few years ago, same with some pro Palestinian).

          And STILL, it is normal to read in major newspapers and hear on TV "die [...]frage". It has no association with die judenfrage - we see "Die Rentenfrage", now in winter "Die Energiefrage" "Die Klimafrage" und "Die Umweltfrage". Would these all offend the council member(s) as well?

          And yet, while being a very American thing, there were game-shows on TV and people STILL say everyday in conversations "the 'million dollar' question" or variations, should this be dropped from the language?



          I know that in the "deplorable" side of the internet, politics discourse use these terms frequently and are filled with Nazis (either trolling or genuine). But I don't know of we should change so much language because of a few Groypers who can't even not be anonymous. Although I do agree that if some phrasing that is dog whistly can only be seen as a dog whistle, we absolutely shouldn't use it - no one in their right minds should show any form of acceptance to those people, even by mistake.


          I just hope these council members don't use that popular and awesome lightweight JSON processor/wrangler

          Comment

          • TheMightyBuzzard
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2021
            • 439

            #55
            Originally posted by gquintard View Post

            Aren't you being a tiny dramatic? Like, I don't think people put pronouns in their bio to set the world on fire. If they are, it's probably the least effective arsonist strategy ever.

            However, people trying to elevate that to a world-ending issue, well, they probably have something to sell you.

            It's interesting that you despise pronouns, but are fine with Mr/Ms/Mrs. Aren't you upset that women get twice as many denominators as men do?

            Don't you have anything better to do than being angry and afraid all the time?
            Not dramatic. Not angry. Not afraid.

            It's very obvious to anyone who isn't drinking the Kool-Aid and rabidly attacking anyone who points out the big box of cyanide in the kitchen. Every single woke ideal/policy is designed to fragment Western society. Every last one. There isn't a single one that doesn't or that produces anything that works to further these societies. Therefore the only explanation for them is they aren't designed to further society but to fragment and destroy it. The support of mass immigration from failed, violent cultures without attempting to have the immigrants adapt to Western culture (instead of the other way around) should have been a major clue.

            Comment

            • bacteriamanicure
              Phoronix Member
              • Feb 2024
              • 68

              #56
              Originally posted by sandain View Post

              Serious question here: what is wrong with putting pronouns in bios? I personally work with a lot of people from different backgrounds from my own, and I have a hard time knowing which pronouns to use based on names alone, especially for non-western names. I'm not even talking about the cis/trans culture war going on right now -- I just prefer to avoid misgendering colleagues and clients I've only met over email.
              People who consider all otherthink wrongthink get mad when otherthinkers are allowed to exist

              If you want to have a laugh you can always misgender transphobes. They get very funny

              Comment

              • TheMightyBuzzard
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2021
                • 439

                #57
                Originally posted by bacteriamanicure View Post

                Most well adjusted Rust hater
                Nope, I like Rust. I quite enjoy coding in it. I'm just not a mindless fanboi and the culture of its community is abhorrent.

                Comment

                • TheMightyBuzzard
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2021
                  • 439

                  #58
                  Originally posted by patrick1946 View Post

                  Ms is nowadays seen as an insult in my culture. And there are other cultures too.

                  And I am not so sure what you mean by western society. One of the most influential streams of western culture were enlightenment and liberalism.
                  If you think wokeness is in anyway related to liberalism, you are extremely deluded. There is nothing remotely liberal about it. It is an authoritarian movement from top to bottom. It is in fact directly opposed to liberalism. Ditto it being enlightened.

                  Comment

                  • sandain
                    Phoronix Member
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 109

                    #59
                    Originally posted by TheMightyBuzzard
                    What is wrong is a bunch of people looking to destroy Western society are playing an idiotic pronoun game to drive a wedge between people and set them at each other's throats. If that weren't the case, pronouns would be superfluous as you could simply add Mr/Ms/Mrs before your name and eliminate all confusion.
                    What about non-gendered titles? I personally earned a doctorate through years of schooling. I prefer to be called by my first name, but if someone wants to be formal I would prefer they use my earned title vs. my given title. To eliminate all confusion, should I be going by Mr. Dr. Sandain, or Dr. Mr. Sandain? That seems silly and absurd.

                    Comment

                    • ssokolow
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2013
                      • 5125

                      #60
                      Originally posted by fotomar View Post

                      This whole ridiculous “taking offense” thing seems to make me think that efforts to stamp out bullying have been a net-negative to society.

                      Furthermore, why are “those people” so sensitive about their own behavior? Seems like they’re struggling against some internalized guilt, no?
                      The ISO has parliament-like rules of behaviour dating back to the 1800s. They're part of what Stroustrup's little clique have been abusing to play "high school mean girls, except they're old men" with people who disagree with their proposals on technical merits.

                      The part about taking offense is more to do with that kind of Victorian era "if you don't follow the letter of our code of etiquette and act on the assumption others are following the spirit of it, we'll kick you out" performative behaviour that you normally only see weaponized in parliament these days.​
                      Last edited by ssokolow; 03 December 2024, 01:50 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X