Originally posted by darkonix
View Post
Rustls Multi-Threaded Performance Is Battering OpenSSL
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by sdack View PostWhile I do not like the tone in this discussion, the Rust community is taking a great risk with this particular project. If Rustls shows to be more secure and faster than other implementations, then not much will happen and Rust will continue to claim its usefulness and place. If the Rustls project shows to be as or less secure however, then it will undermine the assumption that using Rust would lead to more secure software. A failure to provide a more secure implementation will have greater consequences for the Rust language and its community. Hopefully will they make sure this is not going to happen but continue to be good competition.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by TheMightyBuzzard
What is wrong is a bunch of people looking to destroy Western society are playing an idiotic pronoun game to drive a wedge between people and set them at each other's throats. If that weren't the case, pronouns would be superfluous as you could simply add Mr/Ms/Mrs before your name and eliminate all confusion.
However, people trying to elevate that to a world-ending issue, well, they probably have something to sell you.
It's interesting that you despise pronouns, but are fine with Mr/Ms/Mrs. Aren't you upset that women get twice as many denominators as men do?
Don't you have anything better to do than being angry and afraid all the time?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Volta View Post
Yeah, right. Currently rust is probably the shittiest one when comes to multithreading. It's only easier to do multithreading with it. At least in some part. OpenSSL is just bad example. Let's take Linux and PostgreSQL. They eat any shit written in rust for breakfast.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by sandain View Post
Serious question here: what is wrong with putting pronouns in bios? I personally work with a lot of people from different backgrounds from my own, and I have a hard time knowing which pronouns to use based on names alone, especially for non-western names. I'm not even talking about the cis/trans culture war going on right now -- I just prefer to avoid misgendering colleagues and clients I've only met over email.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Almindor View PostMutable pointer aliasing optimizations have been possible on Rust for many years, but ironically because they're not possible for C/C++ the optimization path was broken in LLVM (C++ code, double irony).
If you, however, lie about the pointer aliasing this leads to undefined behavior. That's one of the reasons why that keyword is not widely used in C99.
And that was the main reason why this optimization was broken in llvm for a long time.
What is true is, that in rust restrict is the default, as rust knows about the pointer aliasing.
Last edited by oleid; 03 December 2024, 01:14 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Raka555 View PostThe thing is the other implementations have decades of baggage. They probably can't touch or understand a lot of the code.
We will have to see how well rustls stands up after 30 years of different people hacking on its code base.
Having said that, it is always nice to see someone raising the bar.
If only windows could get it….
Comment
-
Comment