Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rust-Written Rustls Now Reportedly Outperforming OpenSSL & BoringSSL

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Weasel View Post
    Since they were one of the first ones to switch from C++ to Rust? So their reasoning is irrelevant.
    Rust was developed at Mozilla. I'd be surprised if they weren't the first ones using it.

    Originally posted by Weasel View Post
    ...and who said those devs are quality? Hard to say for Microsoft or Apple, since they're mostly closed source, but I know people who saw Windows source code (either by working there or due to those infamous leaks) say it's a clusterfuck disaster, or something along those lines. There's your clue.

    For Apple, you know there was the infamous "goto fail" security bug in iOS that didn't apply to the if because of no brace? That's enough to tell you the skill level of their C programmers. How the fuck did such shit pass review in the first place?

    What else do you want? You link to logical fallacies (no true scotsman) but you're literally doing argument from authority because clearly you don't even bother to think if they have good coders or not (they likely don't).
    No, I said that, if anyone has the budget and impetus to hire or train good C++ coders (assuming such people exist in the context of large codebases developed by teams of people in the real world), it'd be at least one of those three companies. Thus, the fact that all three of them are using Rust and failed to get their memory-safety CVEs down without it suggests that it's not feasible to hire or train such people.

    Originally posted by Weasel View Post
    I mean yeah, Rust will likely bring down the bug rate, since most devs suck. But it's pure skill issue though. That is a fact.

    Good thing the economy is going worse these days so those subpar noobs get laid off and only the quality ones remain. (nothing to do with programming language mind you, but the skill level of the dev itself)
    We shall see. I still think anyone who is too manly to wear a seatbelt is a fool.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ssokolow View Post

      Rust was developed at Mozilla. I'd be surprised if they weren't the first ones using it.



      No, I said that, if anyone has the budget and impetus to hire or train good C++ coders (assuming such people exist in the context of large codebases developed by teams of people in the real world), it'd be at least one of those three companies. Thus, the fact that all three of them are using Rust and failed to get their memory-safety CVEs down without it suggests that it's not feasible to hire or train such people.



      We shall see. I still think anyone who is too manly to wear a seatbelt is a fool.
      why argue with that person any longer?

      waste of keystrokes

      sucks to suck, as they say

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Weasel View Post
        I mean yeah, Rust will likely bring down the bug rate, since most devs suck. But it's pure skill issue though. That is a fact.

        Good thing the economy is going worse these days so those subpar noobs get laid off and only the quality ones remain. (nothing to do with programming language mind you, but the skill level of the dev itself)
        Rust developers at Google are twice as productive as C++ teams:


        Is this a skill issue?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by darkonix View Post
          Rust developers at Google are twice as productive as C++ teams:


          Is this a skill issue?
          Yeah. Either that, or their C++ code is just hot garbage (and old), like Mozilla's. Can't say without looking at their code.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Weasel View Post
            Yeah. Either that, or their C++ code is just hot garbage (and old), like Mozilla's. Can't say without looking at their code.
            Y'know, sooner or later you wind up with this:

            Everyone: We can't walk on water
            Jesus: LOL. Skill issue.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by ssokolow View Post

              Y'know, sooner or later you wind up with this:

              Everyone: We can't walk on water
              Jesus: LOL. Skill issue.
              If it's something everyone could do with willpower, then yeah. I don't think that's the case though.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Weasel View Post
                If it's something everyone could do with willpower, then yeah. I don't think that's the case though.
                Thank you for finally properly describing writing correct C++ as part of a team of N humans where N>1.

                Comment


                • Dude, your analogy implied a physical constraint, something people can't physically do due to laws of physics (unless you find out how and enlighten us?)

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X