Originally posted by ryao
View Post
That should change in the near future with higher end designs being made:
/PRNewswire/ -- Ventana Micro Systems Inc. today announced its Veyron family of high performance RISC-V processors. The Veyron V1 is the first member of the...
There are others, but those two caught my attention. At the low end, you have things like these:
RISC-V is basically where ARM was 10 to 15 years ago, and it is catching up fast. ARM’s recent moves to change its business model are accelerating this trend. Suing Qualcomm and then talking about moving royalties to device makers based on the cost of the device to be paid several times more for the same thing are moves pushing companies to RISC-V.
That said, there is the chicken and egg problem to address in that people have little incentive to adopt RISC-V hardware without software support and there is little incentive to adopt it without hardware adoption. The open source community really should be working on RISC-V support to help break this chicken and egg situation, lest we be stuck with lousy options from ISA IP rights holders demanding ever increasing sums of money for the same thing. I recently have been increasingly looking at RISC-V.
Unfortunately, hardware that I consider good enough for me to get started with RISC-V was only recently announced and hardware suitable for a company I know that has almost finished its ARM migration is not on the market yet. The closest thing to something suitable for them is this:
ARIES Embedded "MSRZG2UL" and "MSRZFive" OSM compliant modules are based on respectively Renesas RZ/G2UL Arm and RZ/Five RISC-V processors.
If it had a GPU for hardware accelerated electron on X11 on a touch screen, it would be perfect, provided electron begins to support RISC-V.
Leave a comment: