Dragonfly 1.0 Released For What Claims To Be The World's Fastest In-Memory Data Store

[phoronix]

Phoronix: Dragonfly 1.0 Released For What Claims To Be The World's Fastest In-Memory Data Store

Dragonfly as what's a high performnace in-memory database compatible with the Memcached and Redis APIs has reached version 1.0...

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Dragonflydb-1.0-Released

[tildearrow]

Tpyo:

Phoronix: Dragonfly 1.0 Released For What Claims To Be The World's Fastest In-Memory Data Store

Dragonfly as what's a high performnace in-memory database compatible with the Memcached and Redis APIs has reached version 1.0...

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Dragonflydb-1.0-Released

This Dragonfly database software is available under a Business Source License 1.1 release after 2028 will convert to Apache 2.0.

Huh?

[waxhead]

Tpyo:
Huh?

The database version 1.0 used license v1.1 while releases made after 2028 will use Apache 2.0 licence.

[LtdJorge]

The database version 1.0 used license v1.1 while releases made after 2028 will use Apache 2.0 licence.

No, the BSL automatically converts to an open source license after a defined amount of time. So THIS release will be BSL licensed until 2028, when it will convert to Apache 2.0

[espi]

This looks interesting, my work has a service that has massive problems with Redis being too slow for the concurrency. Dragonfly looks like a good alternative. I tried it and it certainly has worse latency at low loads than Redis, I need to do some larger tests.

Nonetheless, Redis made an article showing that a properly configured Redis cluster absolutely stomps Dragonfly. But that setup is much more fragile and complex to setup.

[waxhead]

No, the BSL automatically converts to an open source license after a defined amount of time. So THIS release will be BSL licensed until 2028, when it will convert to Apache 2.0

Aye! I stand corrected!

[BrokenAnsible]

Aye! I stand corrected!

Furthermore, the BSL only grants explicitly the use of the work in non-production. The granter has the ability in the BSL to extend the production use under their own distinct terms. Example: MariaDB lets you use their software in production if you have 3 or server instances or less.

[BrokenAnsible]

Furthermore, the BSL only grants explicitly the use of the work in non-production. The granter has the ability in the BSL to extend the production use under their own distinct terms. Example: MariaDB lets you use their software in production if you have 3 or server instances or less.

For MaxScale I should have said. (sorry for the self-quote, the edit feature doesn't work for me in Brave)

[idrisz19]

(sorry for the self-quote, the edit feature doesn't work for me in Brave)

I believe that that's a forum configuration issue instead of a browser issue. I can confirm that I experience the same with both Blink- and Gecko-based browsers.

[tildearrow]

The database version 1.0 used license v1.1 while releases made after 2028 will use Apache 2.0 licence.

What I mean is that I see a grammar mistake:

This Dragonfly database software (S) is available (V) under a Business Source License 1.1 (O) release after 2028 will convert to Apache 2.0.