Originally posted by kpedersen
View Post
Also, I'm curious why you feel qualified to make such a confident prediction. Have you read anything about existing quantum programming languages? Did you even read the blog post linked from the article or look at the tutorial? Do you have any clue how long it takes them to setup, converge, or read out?
Python is workable for QC for the same reasons it's dominating AI. Because the parts written in it aren't the bottleneck. And if you don't need C/C++, then it's just another way to hurt yourself, multiply the amount of effort, and waste a lot of time on bugs that wouldn't happen in a higher-level language.
It always amazes me how many people blindly assume quantum computing will follow the exact same path as conventional Turing machines and expect to have a quantum-enabled laptop or cell phone, in a couple decades.
Comment