Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Red Hat Is Hiring More LLVM Compiler Engineers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by blackiwid View Post

    Which he is obviously correct, if a person don't know that he has sex with another person being forced to, and she shows clear consent, then you can't assault somebody. That is the femnazi inter-sectional redefinition of words that goes on in the US.

    Because if you got raped in Europe or the US are at this stage as example not even remotely the same words, you basically can't translate this words anymore.

    The newest definition of the US Wokistan is that if a women has consenting sex but drunk 1 beer and the next day thinks it was maybe a bad they even she enjoyed it at the evening... it's rape... Maybe we need some international comity that defines and explains words.

    It's not only the absurd redefinitions the radical left Americans do, it's also the absolute failure of wisdom of meaning of words, so apparently most Americans think that when people have sex with subadults that they are pedophiles or even if they rape young kids that that was "pedophilia", pedophilia is a sexual orientation, if you get 1mio dollar to fuck a guy and do that that also makes you not gay, and the same is true for straight people having sex with small children because they are easy victims.

    And if you start canceling people because you are either stupid or woke and don't understand reality then we talk about a psychopat or mentally disabled country... get your shit together America maybe forbid social media and close the university if you are to immature to handle it...

    Or you need public healthcare and then send all the twitter users to mental institutions to get them help. It's insufferable and shameful.
    What's shameful is that you wrote this.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by uncle h.

      this is why he's relevant and you're not. Your post is just scatterbrain stupidity that betrays your low iq.
      lol, ok.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by paulpach View Post
        He was making excuses for his friend Minsky. His argument was basically that Minsky didn't know she was a prostitute. It is a stretch to say he excuses sex slavery.
        He picked up standard excuses used by rapists – "He thought she wanted him". Bullshit. The young woman in question was a sex slave and RMS made excuses that his friend raped her.

        He could have just shut the fuck up, considering that his fried is dead anyway. But no, RMS made excuses for fucking sex slavery.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Uncle H.
          lugenpresse
          Picking up Nazi terminology. Says enough where you stand....

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by ssokolow View Post
            Because Stallman admitted that he'd made the wrong decision and retired his version of GCC to rebrand EGCS as the new GCC 2.95
            but why fork didn't continue as fork? (hint: egcs was forked in the first place because gcc wasn't merging existing forks which wanted to merge. i.e. egcs was forked to reduce number of forks)
            Last edited by pal666; 14 May 2021, 09:15 PM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by pal666 View Post
              but why fork didn't continue as fork? (hint: egcs was forked in the first place because gcc wasn't merging existing forks which wanted to merge. i.e. egcs was forked to reduce number of forks)
              Because the GCC name was more valuable than the EGCS name when Stallman admitted he was wrong, so the best code and the best name were merged into a "best of both worlds" project... as it should be.

              Comment

              Working...
              X