Originally posted by coder
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pyston 2.1 Is Blowing Past Python 3.8/3.9 Performance
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by rmfx View Post
I didn’t say it could replace it tomorrow, i said they should starts preparing a cpython replacement with pypy (and complete it with what’s needed for this).
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I was impressed at first, since e.g. portage (Gentoo) depends on python (well and a lot of other packages).
But then, in the end the article mentioned that it is not freedom software (too bad it's not open source). Uh. Seriously, could have saved me some time if that was in the beginning. :/Stop TCPA, stupid software patents and corrupt politicians!
- Likes 3
Comment
-
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Anarchy View Post
Realistically, it might be better to just fork the language itself and improve the parts that make Python "slow"; pypy developers have already done some work in this department. Although even that is not optimal because if you need more performance from python, then you're using it wrong -- go and learn c/c++/rust/fortran/java/go.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
There are low-hanging fruits in the CPython that could make it perform better. It just isn't a main priority to CPython developers. Hopefully, a bit of external competition will make them revisit this and make some improvements, i.e. in memory allocator, hash tables, and other tricks. JIT in CPython is not going to happen for a really long time, because of how it can sometimes make performance worse, and because how much it would complicate code, and testing required (especially on various architectures).Last edited by baryluk; 29 January 2021, 02:55 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment