Originally posted by tildearrow
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Microsoft Makes Their C++ Standard Library Open-Source (STL)
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Nemerian View Post
Hmmm, wait a second, maybe that's why they were hiring open-source devs for Windows Core OS.
The kernel is already becoming pretty "in-house", modular, and scalable, due to the OneCore project.
Maybe the wanna make the kernel small and barebones, dump everything problematic into the Win32 subsystem, that is only for desktop, and provide WCOS as a sort of open-source NT version of the AOSP.
Also I'm pretty sure Win32 isn't only for desktop.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostHighly Unlikely. As most long-lived software it will have parts that were licensed from third parties and they can't opensource, stuff they can't defend reliably against patent infringing lawsuits, and maybe even stuff they plain stole.
The kernel is already becoming pretty "in-house", modular, and scalable, due to the OneCore project.
Maybe the wanna make the kernel small and barebones, dump everything problematic into the Win32 subsystem, that is only for desktop, and provide WCOS as a sort of open-source NT version of the AOSP.
Leave a comment:
-
so much naming confusion. stl is "standard template library", it is a part of "c++ standard library" consisting of containers/iterators/algorithms. they certainly opensourced more than stl, probably whole c++ standard library
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by skeevy420 View Post
Dude, you'z on teh internets and we haz videeoz of peoples playing teh game teh fastest evers for 29 yeerz to beat it 3 milliseconds fasta.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View Post
I never investigated this, and I somehow doubt your statement at face value. Who took the time to look at the authors of dozens of manuals
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oiaohm View PostThe fact they are still removing things. Sooner or latter they will hit something important
Its really interesting if you look at those third party manuals how many are in fact written by either current or X Microsoft staff., So I am not sure competition would be fierce. More likely to be false competition.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostAs I said the only thing that would have been useful would have been the integrated help, and that is so long since gone (XP is basicallly stone age by now). Anything else they removed since then is barely making a dent, imho.
The latest build rolling out to Windows Insiders in the Fast Ring aims to completely revamp how you discover, manage, and customize the fonts on your PC.
Like maybe having to pay for fonts in future.
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostThey might sure try, but there are already very good third party manuals so the competition would be very fierce.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oiaohm View PostI would not say different. I would say I have noticed how Microsoft has been slowly cooking everyone.
As I said the only thing that would have been useful would have been the integrated help, and that is so long since gone (XP is basicallly stone age by now). Anything else they removed since then is barely making a dent, imho.
I do wonder if Microsoft is planning on cutting the online help down now so they can sell how to use books again.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: