@Kebbabert
It scales great.
Linux scales great on Big Irons.
Nope, you proof me it's not chosen, because of this.
I don't think so, because you're lying. I explained you many times some things and you still don't understand them. However, about Solaris stability (or rather no stability):
there's many more as you can read in this link.
I explained this few times. Still some problems? :>
Another example? There are many more which shows it sucks. Oh, be careful when using DTrace
Incredibly robust: http://forum.percona.com/index.php/m/4404/
And some design error: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9548
Tannenbaum didn't say Linux scales bad, so what are you talking about? I said don't fool yourself talking about Tannenbaum. I consider he's an asshole and maybe even an idiot. Very close minded one.
You know I'm right in some part, but you still consider you're right when comes to some point. However, very bad example and in this case I suppose you didn't mean anything. This is a difference :> Btw. It's your problem. To understand me sometimes you've got to think, but you have problems with this.
If RCU is soo good for Linux, why does Linux scale bad on Big Iron, then? Admittedly, Linux scales well on large clusters, maybe because of RCU?
Anyway, RCU or not, Linux sucks on Big Iron. But scales well on clusters.
Question C) Can you prove that claim? Show me links proving that Linux is chosen over Solaris because of performance and stability issues. There are no such links. Why do you lie, then? Are you a liar?
Fine. If you want me to stop "spreading FUD" I will stop. I promise. But then I need to see some proofs so I can change my mind. Please show me links and proofs that you are correct, and I am wrong. If you can show such links, then I will change my mind. I promise.
And you want to do this on Solaris?
Abso-fucking-loutely not. It's too unstable and unpredictable under loads. Not comstar; Solaris itself.
I've been working with Sun for nearly 20 years. Even attempting what you're talking about, is data suicide.
Abso-fucking-loutely not. It's too unstable and unpredictable under loads. Not comstar; Solaris itself.
I've been working with Sun for nearly 20 years. Even attempting what you're talking about, is data suicide.
Regarding your "valuable links", please do not show links on some guy having problems on installing ancient Solaris v8 - as a proof that Solaris is unstable on large systems. Please show me some real life testimonies. Do not show me a feature list or whatever.
Another example? There are many more which shows it sucks. Oh, be careful when using DTrace
Incredibly robust: http://forum.percona.com/index.php/m/4404/
And some design error: http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9548
Que? What do you mean? Do you mean that professor and researcher Tannenbaum says that Linux scales bad? Or do you mean that Tannenbaum does not Linux? What the hell do you mean with this sentence? I CAN NOT READ YOUR MIND.
Ok, now you will face the problems I have with you. What do I mean when I write like this?
"Yes I know but I am correct on Tannenbaum, and your second argument is flawed"
"Yes I know but I am correct on Tannenbaum, and your second argument is flawed"
Comment