Originally posted by kebabbert
View Post
I am trying to say that just recently, Linux had some great scalability problems on 64 cpu machines. Linux is still inmature on Big Iron. I bet there are lots of other areas where Linux still has scalability problems. Solaris has been doing this on Big Iron for decades. I doubt Solaris performance can be 250 times increased.
This is not true, but I am trying to say something like: If it is impossible to improve Solaris performance 250 times, but you can still improve Linux 250 times - which is most mature? I bet there are still large optimizations to be done on Linux. Linux is not mature, it has not scaled on Big Iron for decades yet.
About profffs. It was a joke to show this discussion is idiotic... You see - profffs. I make grammar mistakes, but not like this The problem is there's too much FUD about Linux scaling. It's even mentioned in one of the articles you gave. Sorry I ignored you're reply before. I should response to you...
Comment