Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

StormOS Enters Beta

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • phoronix
    started a topic StormOS Enters Beta

    StormOS Enters Beta

    Phoronix: StormOS Enters Beta

    A beta version of StormOS has emerged, which is a desktop distribution that is based upon the Nexenta Core Platform that in turn is derived from OpenSolaris but with an Ubuntu user-land. The StormOS project emerged out of the an OpenSolaris user being dissatisfied with the slow pace of OpenSolaris on netbooks and preferring the APT packaging system to Sun's Image Packaging System. The beta version of StormOS is shipping with an Xfce 4 desktop and -- unlike the current releases of OpenSolaris -- even ships with a word processor.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=13930

  • andy_js
    replied
    Originally posted by d2kx View Post
    Beautiful font rendering.
    Thats not the default, check out the screenshots on stormos.org

    Leave a comment:


  • RealNC
    replied
    Solaris for the desktop is like mustard for ice cream... Last time I tried Solaris (2008.something) my network card wasn't working, no sound, graphics slow as molasses. Seriously, Solaris is still only suitable for what is was created in the first place: specialized workstations trimmed to run it.

    And what does StormOS do? It drops the Linux kernel from a GNU/Linux setup and replaces it with a kernel that has awful hardware support. The only reason this thing exists is because it's a fun project for its developers. I see no real use here.
    Last edited by RealNC; 06-06-2009, 03:07 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • oneman
    replied
    yeh rite need a stable os, ok so we have 1 user

    all this solaris stuff is uno neat, cuz solaris was all bad as fuck in the 90's and sun computers look cool and were super mega leet in the 90's

    and I think its great sun open sourced it, since uno, they pretty much had to in order to survive or have some plan at all..

    but now any of these solaris dirivitive jives are hobbiest stuff only, its not going to be mainstream for normal users or even power users ever. its hobby stuff, and for the matter hobby stuff can be great. but don't delude yourself to believe linux itself is unstable... hardly.

    don't confuse firefox crashes with linux crashes

    Leave a comment:


  • hakl
    replied
    Vi? Everyone knows ed is the standard: http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msg.html

    Leave a comment:


  • kraftman
    replied
    Originally posted by toninio View Post
    I do not think that there is a perfect free OS.

    I have to admit that I do not think the current releases of the Linux kernel are that stable. Is there a well defined functionality tests, regression tests? Never heard of them.
    I never heard of regression tests when comes to solaris, bsd, macos, windows... What the hell defined functionality test means?! There are regression tests, but you can read about them... And if you didn't hear, it doesn't mean there aren't such tests...

    Also the Linux based distros have the richest userland and that is why people prefer it rather than Solaris, BSD.
    Buahahaha, I try to stay away from such geeks as far as possible, but I couldn't resist. You want to be cool geeky hacker/pro user, because you choose systems which have less users then Linux? Go further, write your own OS wich will be controlled by hexadecimal code written ONLY in ED (vi is too weak - see bellow). This will be cool! Or go even further and use hurd...

    So a distro that uses a non Linux kernel, but has the packages of a standard Linux based distro like Debian might be the stable and usable OS we all need (or at least me).
    Might be, but probably isn't. Much more people are working on Linux, much more eyes look at it...
    Last edited by kraftman; 06-06-2009, 12:57 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Apopas
    replied
    Originally posted by toninio View Post
    I do not think that there is a perfect free OS.
    There is no perfect OS in general, not only free but proprietary as well. So, instead of making hybrids and short living unixlike OSes don't you think it should be better to to use that hands and the time you waste there, to make just one free OS the perfect one?

    Leave a comment:


  • Apopas
    replied
    Originally posted by toninio View Post
    I have to admit that I do not think the current releases of the Linux kernel are that stable. Is there a well defined functionality tests, regression tests? Never heard of them.
    Yeah you give real proof here... and then the Linux users will say the oppossite etc etc... Seriously, do you think projects like this have a reason to exist?
    Last edited by Apopas; 06-06-2009, 08:50 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • toninio
    replied
    I do not think that there is a perfect free OS.

    I have to admit that I do not think the current releases of the Linux kernel are that stable. Is there a well defined functionality tests, regression tests? Never heard of them.

    Also the Linux based distros have the richest userland and that is why people prefer it rather than Solaris, BSD.

    So a distro that uses a non Linux kernel, but has the packages of a standard Linux based distro like Debian might be the stable and usable OS we all need (or at least me).

    More on the topic:
    http://debian.fmi.uni-sofia.bg/~tonc...-kFreeBSD.html

    Leave a comment:


  • RealNC
    replied
    Who on earth needs that?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X