Originally posted by aht0
View Post
Meanwhile, btrfs works fine in my nas that has 512 MiB of RAM total (running LEDE or Debian).
It's misconception like "ZFS was designed hurriedly and corners were cut all the time".
Although it's certainly case with the Btrfs.
Although it's certainly case with the Btrfs.
Because I always thought it was btrfs that was designed to allow that, and that ZFS added something basic like array shrinking quite a bit of time after first release in production.
That's the main reason it is taking more time to develop. It's not cutting corners.
Comment