NPB on OMP or MPI
How to know whether NPB benchmark is done using OMP or MPI?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Quad-Core ODROID-X Battles NVIDIA Tegra 3
Collapse
X
-
Run whatever you want as long as it's not using too much IO
Slowing down the Atom might not produce very fair results unless you can also clock down memory frequency. Anyway I guess your Atom has wider and faster memory than your ARM SoC. I'd really like to see some Medfield benchmarks as that is what is closest to ARM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ldesnogu View PostNice tests!
When will we see an Atom/Medfield vs Cortex-A9 battle again? I'm tired reading people claims that Medfield is faster even though I know it isn't
I have an Atom N450 based netbook and can run some phoronix based benchmarks versus Cortex-A8 and Cortex-A9 if anybody is interested. Maybe even locking all of them to run at 1GHz to make it more "fair" and easier to compare.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SolarNet View PostI have some more benchmarks here... the suite keeps crashing at compile bench for some reason... will have to look at that...
Leave a comment:
-
I have some more benchmarks here... the suite keeps crashing at compile bench for some reason... will have to look at that...
openbenchmarking.org/result/1208245-AR-1208223AR23
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SolarNet View PostNext test will be to fully engage the rest of the board and measure.
Leave a comment:
-
Sweet. 11W normal with spikes to 12W... and that is in my hypercooled mineral oil bath to be safe (seriously, I'll take a picture). Next test will be to fully engage the rest of the board and measure. Might need to break the nitrogen out for that one...
Actually, I'm surprised at how stable it has been. I have only just now dropped it into the oil bath.
Leave a comment:
-
I will try this out... see if I can find the true peak power. I have some more benchmarks at
OpenBenchmarking.org, Phoronix Test Suite, Linux benchmarking, automated benchmarking, benchmarking results, benchmarking repository, open source benchmarking, benchmarking test profiles
comparing a dual-core Exynos (Soft-float) to the quad-core Exynos (Hard-float)... the numbers aren't quite twice as good as I thought they would be. Worse PE / RAM ratio might be in play there... thanks...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SolarNet View PostSS, were you running your OMAP4430 off of USB / OTG power on your original cpuburn test? I have heard that you can run current a bit above spec on the original Pandaboard (but not the 4460 ES). Still, I would be surprised it you can run it at ~300% above spec... I have had quite a bit of success with OTG power so I will give this a try on a Panda A2 generation.
The power peaks I am seeing on ODROID-X seem to be during the c-ray PTS tests which peaks at 7W.
Code:$ wget https://raw.github.com/ssvb/ssvb.github.com/master/files/2012-04-10/ssvb-cpuburn-a9.S $ gcc ssvb-cpuburn-a9.S $ ./a.out
How are you getting your direct current measurements? I will instrument my boards if I find a good way to measure that...
Leave a comment:
-
SS, were you running your OMAP4430 off of USB / OTG power on your original cpuburn test? I have heard that you can run current a bit above spec on the original Pandaboard (but not the 4460 ES). Still, I would be surprised it you can run it at ~300% above spec... I have had quite a bit of success with OTG power so I will give this a try on a Panda A2 generation. The power peaks I am seeing on ODROID-X seem to be during the c-ray PTS tests which peaks at 7W. How are you getting your direct current measurements? I will instrument my boards if I find a good way to measure that...
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: