Originally posted by btux
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Linux 3.1 Kernel Draws More Power With Another Regression
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by liam View PostCool, thanks.
I use powertop as well, and my system is pretty similiar to yours (you didn't mention the screen size, but I'll assume 14"-15").
Mine is T510 with M620 (i7 2.66GHz) 15" screen @ 1600x900, intel HD graphics and I'm generally in the 18-20W range while IDLE (with FF/Xchat/evince/etc open). Really odd that I'm running through so much more power.
What configuration did you do?
Best/Liam
Second, here's some notes for driver tuning:
Code:#!/bin/bash # This is a collection of notes about various laptop power-tuning I've found on # the internet and tested on a lenovo T410. # Booting with the pcie_aspm=force kernel option helps: # Force ASPM: # 13.4W idle, 34W glxgears # Without: # 14.6W idle, 35W glxgears # Wifi appears to use about 1.8W # Wifi power saving (enabled by powertop) saves perhaps half a watt # Screen uses perhaps 4.5W more on full brightness than on minimum # These tweaks can only be done by root if [ "$(id -u)" != "0" ]; then echo "This script must be run as root" 1>&2 exit 1 fi # Setting power control of all devices to auto possibly saves about 0.8W (need # to do a better test): # (Note that this appears to disable external mice until you re-plug them in.) setauto() { file=$1 if [[ "$file" =~ 'power' ]] then if [[ "$(cat $file)" != "auto" ]] then echo -n $file: cat $file echo "auto" > $file fi fi } for f in $(find /sys/devices/pci* -name "control") do setauto $f done # Disabling nmi_watchdog has no obvious effect: # echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog # Turning off USB (instead of leaving auto) appears to have no effect: # (I seem to have lost the commands to do this. Never mind.)
Comment
-
Face-Palm!
Michael this is a known bug with the intel power management for sandy balls.
Obviously you forget the fact that the latest drivers for the latest hardware are generally unstable in this world and options are chosen to improve the stability.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lgstoian View PostSo since this regresions have been discovered no developer noticed them even if they have been higly present in the media.
I would love to solve the bugs myself but I'm an arhitect I have no idea about brograming. This is a problem too comon present in the linux world. Noone cares about users that are jsut users we aren't programers. And these bugs usually afect us the most.
I have the inverse problem. I know C, but not how to bisect and I have little time to learn. :/
Originally posted by F.Ultra View PostWhy would they care about laptops? IBM only sells servers, Google only uses servers or mobile phones (platforms where this power regression doesn't come into play) and Red Hat mainly focuses on servers. I think the big question is where Ubuntu is, they should be the ones that has most customers targeted by this issue right now.
Originally posted by liam View PostY
Yeah. Sitting at a terminal with most hardware not having drivers would make for a pretty efficient systemj/k
Originally posted by Cyborg16 View PostI have a T410 and I don't think this generation of lenovo machines have brilliant run-times; the lowest wattage I've got out of my machine is about 10W, but usually it's more like 13W. First tip: use powertop and close high-usage applications. In some cases KDE seems to suck a lot of power (though not always); a simpler DE like LXDE or even gnome 2 may save power. Firefox may not be the best web-browser for power-usage.
Second, here's some notes for driver tuning:
Code:#!/bin/bash # This is a collection of notes about various laptop power-tuning I've found on # the internet and tested on a lenovo T410. # Booting with the pcie_aspm=force kernel option helps: # Force ASPM: # 13.4W idle, 34W glxgears # Without: # 14.6W idle, 35W glxgears # Wifi appears to use about 1.8W # Wifi power saving (enabled by powertop) saves perhaps half a watt # Screen uses perhaps 4.5W more on full brightness than on minimum # These tweaks can only be done by root if [ "$(id -u)" != "0" ]; then echo "This script must be run as root" 1>&2 exit 1 fi # Setting power control of all devices to auto possibly saves about 0.8W (need # to do a better test): # (Note that this appears to disable external mice until you re-plug them in.) setauto() { file=$1 if [[ "$file" =~ 'power' ]] then if [[ "$(cat $file)" != "auto" ]] then echo -n $file: cat $file echo "auto" > $file fi fi } for f in $(find /sys/devices/pci* -name "control") do setauto $f done # Disabling nmi_watchdog has no obvious effect: # echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog # Turning off USB (instead of leaving auto) appears to have no effect: # (I seem to have lost the commands to do this. Never mind.)
Code:for i in $(find /sys/devices/pci* -wholename "/sys/devices/pci*/power/control"); do if [[ "$(cat $i)" == "on" ]]; then echo "auto" > $i; fi; done;
Code:for i in $(find /sys/devices/pci* -name "control"); do if [[ $(cat $i) == "on" ]]; then echo "auto" > $i; fi; done;
Last edited by Shining Arcanine; 23 August 2011, 12:01 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shining Arcanine View PostYou can still contribute if you learn to build your own kernel and bisect regressions. It doesn't require programming knowledge and those of us with the knowledge, but not the time to bisect, could look at it.
I have the inverse problem. I know C, but not how to bisect and I have little time to learn. :/
I was looking into these things last night. You can make that command a one liner:
Code:for i in $(find /sys/devices/pci* -wholename "/sys/devices/pci*/power/control"); do if [[ "$(cat $i)" == "on" ]]; then echo "auto" > $i; fi; done;
I am still testing this to find out if it is safe on my laptop. This appears to affect all devices listed under lspci, plus some attached usb devices.
Comment
-
Originally posted by liam View PostCool, thanks.
I use powertop as well, and my system is pretty similiar to yours (you didn't mention the screen size, but I'll assume 14"-15").
Mine is T510 with M620 (i7 2.66GHz) 15" screen @ 1600x900, intel HD graphics and I'm generally in the 18-20W range while IDLE (with FF/Xchat/evince/etc open). Really odd that I'm running through so much more power.
What configuration did you do?
Best/Liam
Code:echo 1 > /sys/module/snd_hda_intel/parameters/power_save for i in /sys/class/scsi_host/host?/link_power_management_policy; do echo min_power > $i done for i in /sys/bus/usb/devices/*/power/autosuspend; do echo 1 > $i done for i in /sys/bus/{pci,i2c}/devices/*/power/control; do echo auto > $i done
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cyborg16 View PostI have a T410 and I don't think this generation of lenovo machines have brilliant run-times; the lowest wattage I've got out of my machine is about 10W, but usually it's more like 13W. First tip: use powertop and close high-usage applications. In some cases KDE seems to suck a lot of power (though not always); a simpler DE like LXDE or even gnome 2 may save power. Firefox may not be the best web-browser for power-usage.
Second, here's some notes for driver tuning:
Code:#!/bin/bash # This is a collection of notes about various laptop power-tuning I've found on # the internet and tested on a lenovo T410. # Booting with the pcie_aspm=force kernel option helps: # Force ASPM: # 13.4W idle, 34W glxgears # Without: # 14.6W idle, 35W glxgears # Wifi appears to use about 1.8W # Wifi power saving (enabled by powertop) saves perhaps half a watt # Screen uses perhaps 4.5W more on full brightness than on minimum # These tweaks can only be done by root if [ "$(id -u)" != "0" ]; then echo "This script must be run as root" 1>&2 exit 1 fi # Setting power control of all devices to auto possibly saves about 0.8W (need # to do a better test): # (Note that this appears to disable external mice until you re-plug them in.) setauto() { file=$1 if [[ "$file" =~ 'power' ]] then if [[ "$(cat $file)" != "auto" ]] then echo -n $file: cat $file echo "auto" > $file fi fi } for f in $(find /sys/devices/pci* -name "control") do setauto $f done # Disabling nmi_watchdog has no obvious effect: # echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog # Turning off USB (instead of leaving auto) appears to have no effect: # (I seem to have lost the commands to do this. Never mind.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jonimus View PostWow, all you people are retarded, this was an intel issue and the reason that they disabled that by default is because it was still buggy. Blaming linus for something that was clearly a smart decision by the Intel DRM devs. They chose stability over power consumption, its as easy as that. Its the same thing with the ASPM power regression by defaulting to it being enabled they had issues arise so they had to fix the issues. Yes it sucks for those who didn't have those stability issues with it enabled but at least it has a better chance of it working for those who did.
Also I know for a fact that Michael has said he doesn't report bugs of bisect things because it would take time from writing articles and gathering the data within them. He rarely digs deeper into the issues by doing things like bisecting or finding an linking to relevant upstream bugs, in fact he rarely even links to where to find more info, though once in a while he'll include a link to the relevant ML. The articles only "links" are just links to his older articles, which is fine, but he spams them so much without linking offsite or to sources it seems he is just trying to get more page views and thus more ad revenue rather than trying to actually inform the reader better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Med_ View PostWell, Cyborg16 already gave all the useful hints. All i did was adding the following to my rc.local:
Code:echo 1 > /sys/module/snd_hda_intel/parameters/power_save for i in /sys/class/scsi_host/host?/link_power_management_policy; do echo min_power > $i done for i in /sys/bus/usb/devices/*/power/autosuspend; do echo 1 > $i done for i in /sys/bus/{pci,i2c}/devices/*/power/control; do echo auto > $i done
There are lists of tips and tricks online:
This website is for sale! lesswatts.org is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, lesswatts.org has it all. We hope you find what you are searching for!
Comment
Comment