Ubuntu/Xubuntu/Kubuntu/Lubuntu Power Tests

[DanL]

Better check KDE with some other distro or... check if Nepomuk was disabled when Michael was doing the tests.

In KDE 4.6, Nepomuk is pretty easy on the CPU (not even enough to throttle it). I don't think it would make that much difference, especially after the initial indexing.

[gedgon]

Much higher than mutter.

Only when uncomposited, at least with OpenGL backend.

[kraftman]

Really?

Much higher than mutter.

[gedgon]

To be fair, KDE also had the highest FPS on Nvidia blobs

Really?

[kraftman]

I guess I'll stick to xfce when using battery, because as awesome as Kwin is, it's not worth the loss of precious battery time. Thanks for these tests, Michael.

Better check KDE with some other distro or... check if Nepomuk was disabled when Michael was doing the tests.

[kraftman]

Thanks for the benchmarks.

So KDE is not only a memory hog (as shown by previous benchmarks), but it will also drain your battery like crazy. LOL, this is getting funnier by the day

In KDE when you have compositions enabled you can play games with normal frame rate. Unlike gnome's hell. KDE uses caching, so it's resource efficient. Gnome shell 'uses' memory leak, so it's a real memory hog.

[curaga]

To be fair, KDE also had the highest FPS on Nvidia blobs

[monraaf]

Thanks for the benchmarks.

So KDE is not only a memory hog (as shown by previous benchmarks), but it will also drain your battery like crazy. LOL, this is getting funnier by the day

IMHO any KDE based distro should have an obligatory warning message as part of its installer:

Hazardous to the Environment

[DanL]

I guess I'll stick to xfce when using battery, because as awesome as Kwin is, it's not worth the loss of precious battery time. Thanks for these tests, Michael.

[thefirstm]