System76 Begins Publishing "Virgo" Laptop PCB Design Specs, Confirms Intel Raptor Lake

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • phoronix
    Administrator
    • Jan 2007
    • 67071

    System76 Begins Publishing "Virgo" Laptop PCB Design Specs, Confirms Intel Raptor Lake

    Phoronix: System76 Begins Publishing "Virgo" Laptop PCB Design Specs, Confirms Intel Raptor Lake

    For months Linux hardware vendor System76 has been teasing their in-house designed and manufactured "Virgo" laptop to be built at their facility in Denver. They are hoping to develop the quietest yet most performant Linux laptop. Today they published the initial open-source design files for their custom motherboard PCB in this laptop...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite
  • ayumu
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2008
    • 616

    #2
    Not AMD, not under consideration.

    Comment

    • andyprough
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 2434

      #3
      Originally posted by ayumu View Post
      Not AMD, not under consideration.
      Unfortunately AMD doesn't do any of the coreboot work required to get its chips on a system like this. So it would appear to be AMD that's not under consideration, not the other way around.

      Comment

      • N0dens
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2020
        • 12

        #4
        I guess we each have to choose what we think is the lesser evil...
        The article doesn't tell us much about the laptop other than it is supposed to be "the quietest yet most performant Linux laptop".
        In my mind, "quiet" and "performant" for a laptop means power efficiency.
        However these days, power efficiency means anything but an intel processor... so they don't appear to be very serious with that goal.
        I am hoping to be surprised ... but I won't hold my breath.

        Comment

        • pWe00Iri3e7Z9lHOX2Qx
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2020
          • 1473

          #5
          Originally posted by N0dens View Post
          I guess we each have to choose what we think is the lesser evil...
          The article doesn't tell us much about the laptop other than it is supposed to be "the quietest yet most performant Linux laptop".
          In my mind, "quiet" and "performant" for a laptop means power efficiency.
          However these days, power efficiency means anything but an intel processor... so they don't appear to be very serious with that goal.
          I am hoping to be surprised ... but I won't hold my breath.
          As stated in the article and a response above, it sounds like coreboot support was a requirement for their overall design goals of making this thing as open as they could.

          Comment

          • scottishduck
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2011
            • 498

            #6
            Originally posted by ayumu View Post
            Not AMD, not under consideration.
            AMD don’t support coreboot, they’re not even a possible choice.

            Comment

            • sarmad
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2013
              • 1222

              #7
              Does these files have any more details about the specs? Will it have a dGPU? They said it'll be the "quietest most performant" laptop, but I wouldn't call a laptop performant without a dGPU. Hopefully they'll at least include an Arc dGPU in it.

              Comment

              • andyprough
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2012
                • 2434

                #8
                Originally posted by N0dens View Post
                I guess we each have to choose what we think is the lesser evil...
                The article doesn't tell us much about the laptop other than it is supposed to be "the quietest yet most performant Linux laptop".
                In my mind, "quiet" and "performant" for a laptop means power efficiency.
                However these days, power efficiency means anything but an intel processor... so they don't appear to be very serious with that goal.
                I am hoping to be surprised ... but I won't hold my breath.
                I'm assuming they just mean that it will be quieter and faster than their previous Clevo laptops. Faster by using the newer CPU. Quieter by designing the chassis and cooling system for more quietness. Probably won't be that hard to achieve.

                Comment

                • dreamcat4
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2020
                  • 127

                  #9
                  Originally posted by scottishduck View Post

                  AMD don’t support coreboot, they’re not even a possible choice.
                  I understand that AMD might have been rules out of consideration here for system76 guys. But just speaking in more general broader terms... how does the new AMD openSIL​ fit into the picture here? I mean in regards to which boot time component(s), be it the AGESA part, or UEFI part, or a coreboot?

                  Because isn't it supposed to be that openSIL will eventuall replace the AGESA? (closed source). Which then forms a subset / sub component that the UEFI bios interacts with?

                  So [in theoretical terms]... once OpenSIL can support CONSUMER level (AM4 / AM5) level cpus, then can it be worked upon for support in coreboot? [at some later date]?

                  Or are the AMD policies specifically prohibitive of such a future outcome? (these questions being more-or-less being regardless of whatever system76 is doing with this specific current laptop).

                  Comment

                  • scottishduck
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 498

                    #10
                    Originally posted by dreamcat4 View Post

                    I understand that AMD might have been rules out of consideration here for system76 guys. But just speaking in more general broader terms... how does the new AMD openSIL​ fit into the picture here? I mean in regards to which boot time component(s), be it the AGESA part, or UEFI part, or a coreboot?

                    Because isn't it supposed to be that openSIL will eventuall replace the AGESA? (closed source). Which then forms a subset / sub component that the UEFI bios interacts with?

                    So [in theoretical terms]... once OpenSIL can support CONSUMER level (AM4 / AM5) level cpus, then can it be worked upon for support in coreboot? [at some later date]?

                    Or are the AMD policies specifically prohibitive of such a future outcome? (these questions being more-or-less being regardless of whatever system76 is doing with this specific current laptop).
                    It’s pretty much a guarantee that openSIL will not port backwards and it’s also currently just words in a press release and nothing more.

                    Intel has done the work and continues to do the work, I’ll take that over promises.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X