Originally posted by L_A_G
View Post
Sailfish OS is based on open source and developed by Jolla and the Sailfish OS community.
I can't label my food item as organic / bio if I only have 50-90% organic things in it, it is either 100% or I have to at least mention clearly that both is in there in reality I am not even allowed to use the label bio at all I can't write bio and than small under (but also contains some not bio things), but they don't even have in small letters the constrains of that statement they just skip over the fact that it's proprietary software. Because a software that is even 99% opensource and 1% proprietary as a whole is proprietary. Like with allergic people you can't write "contains no nuts" because it only contains 1% nuts. 1% is enough to control the whole thing, at least if it's the important 1%.
they even write:
We invite [...] community members and Sailfish OS users worldwide to join us in building a more open future.
Originally posted by L_A_G
View Post
Also you say that is how things work, well the problem is they are/were not big enough to create a ecco system only by paid app developers they can't even keep their OS itself up to date as this post proofs. Even Microsoft could not enter with their proprietary OS the market succesful. So if you are not 100% opensource but even less than android 90-99% of opensource developer will ignore you and therefor your system is guaranteed to fail.
So even if we ignore that users want freedom, just from a success only standpoint that is guaranteed receipe of failure.
I think it comes down to that that you technically are right in saying they never said that they fully opensource it, but they used Opensource heavily in marketing and never gave a clear answer about getting it fully or even more opensourced. So you let people in the believe that you want it to be fully opensource if you use marketing language around it and not give a clear "we have no intentions in opensourcing the OS fully, we believe in proprietary software"
I also then here the excuses like they have no right, on the other hand they had never communicated according to you that they want to make it opensource. So which is it now, could they not do it, or did they never have to goal/intention to do it?
Companies always get shit storm not so much for what they do but the communication around it, btw also people... if you have a salami tactic or never say the full truth more and more people correctly start to hate you. If you are a piece of shit, at least be open about it, it's pretty simple.
Comment