Originally posted by Michael_S
View Post
Back then MS was already more or less an established monopoly yet it wasn't that much of a problem for end users, but for other big or emerging players that feared having to operate under its umbrella and allow it to cut into their margins. The FSF movement was started by people who sought to capitalize on that. Sure, Torvalds is not a billionaire, but hey - it is not like the work he actually does merits $10m a month neither.
I don't think that it was unforeseeable that the GPL virus would backfire and act exactly in the interest of monopolies, if anything, it was the most likely thing to happen. Today it is fairly easy to do professional software aimed at independent end users, I mean from a technical perspective, we know the algorithms, we have the much better dev tools, the obstacles are mostly legal, because everything is patented and copyrighted. This wasn't the case back in the early days. Smaller software makers had genuine software secrets the public hasn't caught up with. The GPL would understandably force those to stay away from Linux just to protect their IP. Only powerful corporate entities, with vastly different software needs could afford the armies of ridiculously overpriced lawyers to manage that.
Forcing people to give away their hard work is the exact opposite of freedom. That's why if you bother to examine MS's historical stock prices, you'd realize that even if they were a de-facto monopoly even before the FSF was founded, the total worth of the company began climbing up rapidly only AFTER the FSF and Linux, staying rather flat prior to those events.
The GPL was claimed to be a measure against MS and its monopoly, yet it ended up being the best thing ever in terms of expanding it even after the introduction of alternatives. Which is why today Linux dominates pretty much every field save for the PC - because the FSF neglected, perhaps even betrayed society and regular people, to become a vehicle for corporations that were not MS to siphon wealth out of the general population.
And in fact, today even MS makes a better use and sees more benefit from Linux than your average Joe.
Last but not least, the problem is not and has never been with capitalism, but with corporatism. Very different, pretty much the exact opposite thing.
Comment