Originally posted by RussianNeuroMancer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PowerTOP Still Worthwhile For Extending Linux Battery Life In 2018
Collapse
X
-
I find this interesting because in my HP laptop does not get any watt reduction (nothing above noise) using powertop.
it is a 7700HQ CPU and AMD+Intel GPU.
It idles at 5,5-6.5 watts measured a wall.
(I do undervolt the CPU & GPU, but that does not effect wattage significantly at idle)
Comment
-
Originally posted by THIRSTY GNOMES View PostCare to benchmark powertop vs laptop-mode-tools vs TLP?
However, I still use tld because of its neat management of the Thinkpad's battery features (stop charging before 100%, which greatly extends the service life of the battery, and easy one-time charge-to-max).
Comment
-
I took everything powertop toggles, and most of what tlp toggles, and a bunch of other advise from all across the internet, and plugged it into a fork of indicator-cpufreq that I call indicator-powersave. Even if the indicator (an SNI of the Ayatana variety) wouldn't be useful on your desktop, the backend bash script, "throttle" can be used independently. I also package a systemd service that runs at boot, and a set of udev rules for even earlier setting of powersave features (packaged, but not installed in case systems have old, buggy devices).
The purpose of indicator-powersave and throttle are to provide user-discretion, rather than automated, power management.
To be honest though, I could use some help. I want to make an indicator that can be compiled for panels other than Unity or those with an Ayatana plugin. I could also use some feedback on hardware other than my own (currently not doing anything in particular for ATI gpus, etc, for lack of materiel)
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment