What in AMDs range was the first to support more than 1080? A follow up article expanding on the hardware advancement with the same tests and driver versions showing the cards at their native higher reses with reference back to this article would be interesting.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
18-Way Radeon GPU Benchmarks On Ubuntu 17.10 With Linux 4.14 + Mesa 17.4-dev
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by theriddick View PostDoesn't give too much incentive to upgrade to Vega really, if AMD release a Vega64 Nano ITX card then I will be interested. but I don't think that is ever going to happen. Straight to Navi it seems for me....
It should also undervolt fairly well by then.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stiiixy View PostWhat in AMDs range was the first to support more than 1080? A follow up article expanding on the hardware advancement with the same tests and driver versions showing the cards at their native higher reses with reference back to this article would be interesting.
RX580 is the same kinda performance.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Wow what's up with the 550/560 numbers? Is that some sort of scheduler problem preventing the CPU from being fully utilized for those cards? Is this actually representative of the state of the driver quality for the 550/560? I don't want to harass bridgman about 4-gen-old cards creaming 1-gen-old cards yet again...
Comment
-
Originally posted by oleyska View Post
290 does 1440 flawlessly, like Wolfenstein new order does nice in 1440p but for todays titles it starts to feel dated.
RX580 is the same kinda performance.
So yeah, seeing this exact same testdone with exact same softwareenvironment done with higher-than-1080 resolutions would be very interesting.Hi
Comment
Comment