Originally posted by mcirsta
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Handheld Steam Machine With Linux & AMD SoC Moves Ahead
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by L_A_G View PostIntel SoC's have terrible graphics - So you're now stuck with AMD SoC's
Last edited by Mama Luigi; 11 December 2015, 12:09 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by schmidtbag View PostThe only mistake they made was going for Jaguar cores. They should've done for Carrizo, since that would've been much faster and more power efficient.
Originally posted by schmidtbag View Post​I also think that doing a 720p screen would've been a safer option for both affordability and performance. At 1080p, that's 440PPI, which to me is overkill.
Comment
-
I doubt the performance will be okay for any modern game at 1080p.
Judging by the list of embedded processors in the G-series they will most likely choose the dual-core 9W or the 6W version considering the thermal constraints within such a small device. I haven't managed to find any benchmarks on the 9W skew, but NotebookCheck says that the 6W SKU has the same performance as the A4-1200. Judging by the benchmarks they made it's graphic performance in any 3dmark benchmark with or without physics the processor if behind any Intel Bay Trail sold today in the same thermal envelope (for example the N2805) and that's horrible in graphic performance. I don't know what these people where thinking when they said "it can play any modern game" but this thing will be dead on arrival because it will be able to play only some 2D indie games (like Fez, which they show running) and that's it. All of the other games where streamed over Wi-Fi if you ask me.
Comment
-
Ok, I will do some prediction from past experiences: it will not launch next oktober. Don't get me wrong, I might throw money at it, but it will not be finished in time. You have to have a lot of experience to get this thing in commercial prototype phase at that date.
Since it is supposed to be a gaming rig, I hope they will acknowledge that, and make sure they can easily upgrade APU's before production really starts.
I am an openpandora and ouya veteran. Actually, the ouya was pretty on time.
Oh wait, I am also still waiting on D:OS, but at least that hasn't been delayed as long as the openpandora.
Comment
-
Originally posted by L_A_G View Post
SteamOS and games for it are only available as x86 binaries - So you're stuck with Intel and AMD
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ardje View PostOk, I will do some prediction from past experiences: it will not launch next oktober. Don't get me wrong, I might throw money at it, but it will not be finished in time. You have to have a lot of experience to get this thing in commercial prototype phase at that date.
still, it looks pretty far along already. it looks like a neat concept! and compared to a mid-to-high-end phone, it's not that expensive.
Comment
-
Looks like standard hardware that could run any OS. Basically if you use the Steam streaming feature all you need is hardware accellerated H264, that should be possible. I don't know if it would be fun to play directly on the gfx chip. For streaming only maybe a Shield tablet K1 combined with the gamepad is today a better alternative as you could buy games as a service if your Internet connection is fast. Steam streaming from a Linux host seems to be a bit buggy - does that work fine for somebody?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hamsterkill View PostI'm not sure that's true for SteamOS, anymore. Isn't the Steam Link ARM-based? So Steam and SteamOS must at least be capable of running on ARM. The games obviously still need x86, though.
Originally posted by Mama Luigi View Post....Last edited by L_A_G; 12 December 2015, 02:58 PM.
Comment
-
What GPU does this SoC contain, is it even GCN so it will be supported by amdgpu? And how 'big' is it (in CUs)? How should this Jaguar SoC be able to provide a smooth experience in 1920*1080 w/ this ultra low end graphics and single channel DDR3?
Comment
Comment