Originally posted by computerquip
View Post
The thing is Michael is shooting for quantity over quality. I like this site and I don't use adblock but there are plenty of articles I have an interest in that I don't bother reading, because I know they're just a continuation (or will be) of another article. The problem for Michael is his userbase isn't that large and doesn't have a lot of potential to expand (not everyone has an interest in what this website offers), so while he COULD do longer high-quality articles, he won't get as much revenue as he would dividing the articles into many separate small ones. As far as I'm aware, ads work based on visits, not visit duration.
Anyway, addressing the issue of people always trying to get a hold of free stuff - this is what my personal issue with Canonical was all about. I liked the fact that Canonical did so much to help linux, but they popularized it in a way that attracted the wrong crowd. There are people who want something simply because its free, and there are people who want something because they like what it is or what it represents regardless of price. The people who are parasites to the linux community are the ones who used linux because of at least 2 of the following:
1. The eye candy
2. Security
3. It is free
4. Makes them look like a "hacker"
Canonical, and Valve for that matter, have attracted these kinds of people, and they're the ones who will do things such as pirate software or make unjust complaints about an OS that doesn't work the same way Windows does. Linux has become significantly more user friendly the past 3 years and it has gained a lot of functionality lately too, but these people not only make linux look bad (because they're like "psh it can't do ANYTHING") but they also make the linux community look bad, because they do cheapskate and immature things.
Comment