Originally posted by jron
View Post
ET: Quake Wars - ATI Performance
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Michael View PostIt's all a matter of what cards we have access to.
Some good conclusions can be drawn from Tom's Hardware DX10 Shootout.
Thanks for the new details!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Crane View PostAm I the only one that sees the computer differences here? The ATI is a Dual quad core with 4 gig of ram and the nvidia is a dual core with 2 gig of ram.
How can this possibly determine ATI has better performance? Why not just swap the cards and use the same computer to get a legit test?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hubick View PostNo chance you guys have a 30" LCD to test at 2560x1600 for me??Michael Larabel
https://www.michaellarabel.com/
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Nognir View PostI'm surprised how you guys managed to get the new driver to work out of the box... The forum is flooding with threads about issues of 8.42.3
In general I would personally recommend waiting the two or so days until the drivers are available in the distributions rep, then you are at least sure that the install/build part does work as expected.
Comment
-
-
X1950 Pro 512MB AGP
$fglrxinfo
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: Radeon X1950 Series
OpenGL version string: 2.0.6958 Release
$glxinfo | grep "direct rendering"
direct rendering: Yes
Fresh Ubuntu 7.10 install
$glxgears
13198 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2639.412 FPS etc...
Problem:
glxgears,google earth show instead of 3D black window so no 3D for me ....
Later edit : videos black too...
So if this article is genuine how did Phonorix install and test x1950 Pro?Last edited by Draku; 25 October 2007, 05:15 PM.
Comment
-
Comment