Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Doom 3 Source Code Is About Ready To Go

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • phoronix
    started a topic Doom 3 Source Code Is About Ready To Go

    Doom 3 Source Code Is About Ready To Go

    Phoronix: Doom 3 Source Code Is About Ready To Go

    It looks like id Software will soon be releasing the source code to their very well known Doom 3 game...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTAwOTY

  • pingufunkybeat
    replied
    Originally posted by Drago View Post
    Oh gosh, they did it!
    GLSL 1.30 is ready! Ypee...
    http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mes...896f4451d14de0
    Damn, if there ever was an important post buried in nirvana, this is it.

    Holy shit, this is awesome news! We need a Phoronix story on this ASAP!

    Leave a comment:


  • sbergman27
    replied
    Originally posted by Hamish Wilson View Post
    Hey, seconded. Yes I was ten when it was released, but still, seconded.
    Just wait 30 years. And you'll get yours! ;-)

    Seriously, though. Enjoy the next 30 years. Being 48 is cool and all. But one of the things you learn is that you can never go back. Partially because the world changes. But mostly because you change. Which is fine. And usually an improvement. But the lack of a rewind button does become increasingly noticeable.

    -Steve

    Leave a comment:


  • Drago
    replied
    Oh gosh, they did it!
    GLSL 1.30 is ready! Ypee...
    http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mes...896f4451d14de0

    Leave a comment:


  • Hamish Wilson
    replied
    Originally posted by sbergman27 View Post
    Hurray. But this announcement makes me feel very old. I remember all the years I waited for this game.
    Hey, seconded. Yes I was ten when it was released, but still, seconded.

    Leave a comment:


  • sbergman27
    replied
    Hurray. But this announcement makes me feel very old. I remember all the years I waited for this game. And now the engine is considered to be of no further commercial value. That and the "Big 5-oh" looming less than 2 years away, makes me very happy for the rest of you. But excuse me while I go cry into my pillow. ;-)

    Leave a comment:


  • SavageX
    replied
    Originally posted by AnonymousCoward View Post
    Sure the game data can be proprietary. But the makers of Steel Storm have also not released the game source code and are in direct violation of the GPL.

    You are wrong on this.

    The game code is not derived from GPL code, nor does it link to GPL code. All games for Darkplaces use QuakeC for game code, which is interpreted by the game engine.

    If you were right, you'd be disallowed to play the original Quake release, the commercial mission packs or any non-GPL third-party mods in any open-source Quake engine.


    This is (from my point of view) somewhat similar to how the GPL works at all for Perl. Or (more vaguely) how commercial software can work on a GPL operating system.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ex-Cyber
    replied
    I think the main question is whether someone could reasonably (in principle) swap in a different implementation of the runtime (a la POSIX, libc, sh, Java, etc.). If so, there is no "requires a free software [or rather GPL] runtime environment"; it's just "requires some compatible runtime environment".

    Leave a comment:


  • Hamish Wilson
    replied
    Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
    The author claimed that he is using a vanilla engine (which is GPL) and proprietary artwork and (scripted) game logic, which would be OK, as artwork does not constitute a derivative work.
    That was my impression as well. I do not think scripted game logic affects the GPL either way. I know for a fact one of the reasons the Steel Storm developers picked DarkPlaces is they liked its scripting language, which is also why they are not really using their Unigine license as they do not have the same fondness for the one it uses.

    For example, if I make a program that requires a free software runtime environment, but that program itself is proprietary, does that constitute a violation? As far as I know, that is not the case. So I think they are in the legal clear.

    Leave a comment:


  • yogi_berra
    replied
    Originally posted by AnonymousCoward View Post
    This is illegal.
    Then where is the copyright suit?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X