> "and whatever platform they're creating for"
You have to admit, that part was pretty funny.
The piece people seem to be misunderstanding is this:
> "Microsoft [...] making its tools and technologies available"
That just means "making sure that the DX backend is the preferred one", usually by ensuring that the alternatives bitrot, or are unavailable, or are crippled in some way.
To take an easy and current example, DStorage will have no analog in the win32 API, and no attempt at an alternative implementation will be anything like as performant. Think of it as if splice() was only available to RH-sponsored programs, etc.
You have to admit, that part was pretty funny.
The piece people seem to be misunderstanding is this:
> "Microsoft [...] making its tools and technologies available"
That just means "making sure that the DX backend is the preferred one", usually by ensuring that the alternatives bitrot, or are unavailable, or are crippled in some way.
To take an easy and current example, DStorage will have no analog in the win32 API, and no attempt at an alternative implementation will be anything like as performant. Think of it as if splice() was only available to RH-sponsored programs, etc.
Comment