Originally posted by Alexmitter
View Post
From my perspective, all the launchers you listed are openly hostile to Linux Users and consumers in general. So many of them use game engines and tech that works cross platform it isn't funny and it wouldn't be that difficult for them to offer native Linux versions or to even build upon Wine+Proton and use that. In the case of GOG they offer Linux games and a Windows client. While better than nothing, offering games without a way to manage them can be seen as hostile since the launcher is available on a Unix-like platform already. Even Valve, as great as they are, has their Mafia level percentages.
Playstation and Xbox are basically CustomBSD and CustomWin11 while Stadia is CustomLinux. If games are on all of those platforms in addition to macOS, Switch, and Windows PC then it probably wouldn't take much effort for a Linux release since they already have two releases based on open source technologies that Linux uses -- CustomBSD and CustomLinux. So, yeah, if they're on all of that and not Linux then they're all openly hostile to us. It shows that they have the means and abilities to give us games and they don't. That's openly hostile in my book.
And I don't want to hear about how cheating and DRM is why. Because that is rampant on Windows and hacked consoles...even non-hacked/cracked systems now-a-days thanks to AI controlled cheating rigs -- AI with cameras that watches the TV and plays the game for you (seriously....it's like one or two steps away from being an actual terminator because it's programmed to look for human targets and shoot). So cheating isn't the real reason. DRM, maybe, but they crack games on Windows in hours to days so the few people on Linux that would pirate the cracked Linux release probably isn't the reason either. Frankly, a lot of the cheating should be handled server-side as well as they should start allowing player-hosted servers again. Let the people who want to play that way do so on their own modded servers. It won't stop it all, but it'll stop a lot of it. Limiting player-hosted servers and forcing us to play with cheaters can be considered to be hostile.
It's basically down to lazy or hostile. Pick one. Or both. These days they have every reason to support us between all numerous compatibility methods we have and platforms very similar to ours that they're expected to support.
I'm free to spend my money however I want too. If I limited it to things that didn't support Linux very well or to the highest of standards I'd basically be down to an Intel only PC. AMD doesn't have the best first day hardware support nor do they offer us near as much on the software side as they offer on Windows. In some regards it can be said they do the bare minimum to get by. Firmware fsck Nvidia can be considered better than AMD on Linux in regards to first day support, software, and features...and then you install KDE or something Wayland.
Basically, my point is that everything, hardware and software, is fair game if one gets down to the nitty gritty details. There's probably nothing you can spend your money on that isn't tainted somehow. Even Phoronix is a bad purchase because Michael is a beer drinking degenerate.
Sorry about the wall of text. I tried my best to split it up into paragraphs of separate thoughts.
Comment