Originally posted by sandy8925
Nvidia does have it own sharping filter and upscale that can be combined with games instead of DLSS as well.
Yes the Nvidia sharpening filter and upscale uses less GPU resources than enabling DLSS and can give Nvidia users better performance than using DLSS as well.
There does need to be the question with DLSS 2.0 for the GPU cost is the quality boost over updated classical algorithms that have lower GPU cost worth it. If it not worth it nvidia need to fix their limitations on their own classic sharpening solution.
Yes Nvidia have never themselves showed a proper compare of the Nvidia scaling options and parties reviewing DLSS have also failed in most cases to put DLSS head to head with the classical solutions include in the Nvidia drivers. Pushing DLSS has you buy a new card the updated classical algorithms sharpen and upscale that Nvidia has also works on older Nvidia cards.
The reality here the question of does DLSS provide enough benefit for it cost even using Nvidia parts has never been attempted to be answered properly. Yes just because something has artificial intelligence does not mean it will be providing a cost effective solution or be quirk-less. There is case after case after case where artificial intelligence is worse than classical solutions. We have the same thing with TAA where there is case after case that it loses to classical solutions and some cases newer solutions like sony one.
Yes there is a chance that a person has bought a new Nvidia card to use DLSS when the games they play would have been better handled by the Nvidia classical solutions instead.
Leave a comment: