Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Updated FUTEX2 System Call Patches Posted For Helping Wine/Proton, Other Use-Cases

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ssokolow
    replied
    Originally posted by coder View Post
    I took to LaTeX pretty naturally, but quickly left it behind for XML Docbook. These days, I write mostly one-off docs and don't have cause for procedural generation or proper source control (or else I use a wiki). So, I've not much use for either, sadly.
    Have you tried AsciiDoc? (AsciiDoctor is the most popular modern implementation) It's a Markdown-like lightweight markup system specifically designed to have a 1-to-1 mapping to DocBook XML.

    Leave a comment:


  • CochainComplex
    replied
    Originally posted by clintar View Post

    Wonder if they put it back in, then. Doesn't say in the release log
    in thep roton-ge git repo with tag 6.5-GE-2

    https://github.com/GloriousEggroll/p...patches/proton

    I was able to find

    40-proton-futex2.patch

    which seems to enable futex2

    Leave a comment:


  • clintar
    replied
    Originally posted by CochainComplex View Post

    I have had multiple versions - but the latest one shows "futex2 up and running" in the "Lutris log". I can for sure say that it works.
    Wonder if they put it back in, then. Doesn't say in the release log

    Leave a comment:


  • CochainComplex
    replied
    Originally posted by clintar View Post

    Did you get the version before they updated it removing futex2, then?
    I have had multiple versions - but the latest one shows "futex2 up and running" in the "Lutris log". I can for sure say that it works.

    Leave a comment:


  • clintar
    replied
    Originally posted by CochainComplex View Post
    I'm using these patches since a while via xanmod kernel + proton-ge-6.5 there are for sure performance uplifts. e.g. AC:Origin benchmark has way less stutter on ultra settings.
    Did you get the version before they updated it removing futex2, then?

    Leave a comment:


  • Leopard
    replied
    Originally posted by ms178 View Post
    Just a 4% performance improvement for up to 800 threads and a decrease of 21% for requeue, the numbers don't look that great yet to me. I hope there is potential to improve the performance further.
    For comparing futex() and futex2() performance
    What do you exactly expect here or did you just missed this part?

    Leave a comment:


  • ext73
    replied
    Futex2 v3 + Multigenerational LRU working great under optimized kernels

    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/scodlj5ot...SE3KUDqCa?dl=0

    Leave a comment:


  • coder
    replied
    Originally posted by carewolf View Post
    That sounds like a Tex derivative
    Or yet another who's had more than enough of its "badness"!


    I took to LaTeX pretty naturally, but quickly left it behind for XML Docbook. These days, I write mostly one-off docs and don't have cause for procedural generation or proper source control (or else I use a wiki). So, I've not much use for either, sadly.

    Leave a comment:


  • carewolf
    replied
    Originally posted by coder View Post
    Major missed opportunity. They should've called it FU2TEX!
    That sounds like a Tex derivative

    Leave a comment:


  • coder
    replied
    Major missed opportunity. They should've called it FU2TEX!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X