Khrundel skeevy420 I don't see how being DRM-free is more ethical. DRMs exist to prevent piracy; piracy is unethical. To exclude a DRM to honest buyers is more of a convenience than an ethical problem, especially considering a lot of DRMs are pretty bloated.
Don't get me wrong, I understand and agree with the arguments against DRMs - I also greatly dislike them. But to claim a DRM is unethical because they have an annoying way to go about preventing a crime would be like saying TSA agents scanning you and your stuff at the airport is unethical. Does it slow everything down? Absolutely. Is it annoying? Hell yes it is. Is it an insult to those who would never think of threatening strangers? Sure. Is it failproof? Nope. Despite all of that, none of these things make airport security inherently unethical. The world is a crappy place and as a result, honest people have to be inconvenienced for the sake of making a worst-case scenario less likely to happen.
All that being said, I definitely agree GOG is better if you want to actually keep your games.
Don't get me wrong, I understand and agree with the arguments against DRMs - I also greatly dislike them. But to claim a DRM is unethical because they have an annoying way to go about preventing a crime would be like saying TSA agents scanning you and your stuff at the airport is unethical. Does it slow everything down? Absolutely. Is it annoying? Hell yes it is. Is it an insult to those who would never think of threatening strangers? Sure. Is it failproof? Nope. Despite all of that, none of these things make airport security inherently unethical. The world is a crappy place and as a result, honest people have to be inconvenienced for the sake of making a worst-case scenario less likely to happen.
All that being said, I definitely agree GOG is better if you want to actually keep your games.
Comment