SDL2 Upstreams OS/2 Support

[phoronix]

Phoronix: SDL2 Upstreams OS/2 Support

If 2020 couldn't get more peculiar, today the SDL2 project mainlined support for the OS/2 operating system...

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...nline-OS2-Port

[tildearrow]

Typo:

There has been out-of-tree SDl2 for OS/2

[Adarion]

OS/2... wow. Just wow. I know it was popular among banksters, but iirc. it was a half-dead offspring of some MS/IBM coop and it was around during my DOS days, but it slowly vanished from the normal stage into a few corners. But hey, why not?

[Cthulhux]

I wish that Microsoft had used the NT kernel for OS/2 instead of Windows. OS/2 was the more interesting system in my opinion.

[thunderbird32]

Cool, now they just need to bring back AmigaOS support to SDL2 and all will be good. :P

[programmerjake]

next on the list: OS/360 support :P

[torsionbar28]

I wish that Microsoft had used the NT kernel for OS/2 instead of Windows. OS/2 was the more interesting system in my opinion.

For sure, I have fond memories of OS/2 Warp, it was far more stable than the buggy crashy WinOS's of the day, and had much better networking.

[rmfx]

Instead of cleaning sources from old stuff, they add old stuff nobody use........

[Alex/AT]

Pffft.
WHY, OH WHY?!

[Rob72]

For sure, I have fond memories of OS/2 Warp, it was far more stable than the buggy crashy WinOS's of the day, and had much better networking.

Sure, with the right hardware it was. But if, like most end-users, you had budget hardware it was often anything but stable. Traps galore. Even IBM's own consumer oriented systems (e.g. the Aptiva) where effected by this.

I myself was an OS/2 user, and even have a whole bunch of IBM OS/2 related certifications. For my own systems, I was very picky as to the hardware I put into it for this very reason. The plus side, is that when I installed Slackware Linux in 1995 for the first time as an additional OS, everything just worked (Video, Sound, Networking, CD-ROM) as all my components where well supported.