If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
23-Way Graphics Card Comparison With Shadow of the Tomb Raider On Linux
The fact that a 9900k was used @ 5gh should have yielded even better result than what I got I would have thought.
That's why.
Unlike other distributions that focus on LTS versions, Server versions, Paid versions, CLI only, and more in addition to their desktop versions, Manjaro only focuses on their desktops and a minimal CLI installer that's mainly used for getting alternate desktops up and running...stuff not XFCE, KDE, or Gnome.
Being damn-near bleeding edge and only focusing their attention on desktop usage gives them a slight edge for gaming.
All that makes Manjaro the quintessential Linux Desktop for Gaming OS.
Also, there's a very good chance that you're using some AUR packages built with march=native and those really help give Arch & Manjaro a performance edge over most general purpose distributions.
The fact that a 9900k was used @ 5gh should have yielded even better result than what I got I would have thought.
I've finally had some time to sit down and really get to work on my Radeon VII now, I've managed to get an average of 131 FPS at 1080p, highest settings, no AA, using the following:
Clocks: 1900mhz core, 1100mhz memory, 1050 mv
Mesa: mesa-aco-git 20.0.0_devel.20200115
Kernel: 5.4.8-17-tkg-pds
Compositor: None running at the time.
I'd love to try and push my Radeon VII a little further, but it seems to be unstable when I push either core or memory clocks up from there, and pumping in more voltage doesn't help either.
the Vega 64 I tried was 20% less performance (Superposition Benchmark score 1599) than my Under clocked undervolted R9 290 (Superposition Benchmark score 1983)
but was more power efficient ~3 watts idle
so then tried an RX 570 (Superposition Benchmark score 2780) it out performed my R9 290 by ~ 30% but idled @ 30 watts vs my R9 290 12watts
is their a reason why the Vega would be 50% slower than the RX 570 instead of 50% faster ?
VGA: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Ellesmere [Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590] (rev ef)
OpenGL driver: radeonsi
Kernel driver: amdgpu
name of display: :0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
Extended renderer info (GLX_MESA_query_renderer):
Vendor: X.Org (0x1002)
Device: Radeon RX 570 Series (POLARIS10, DRM 3.40.0, 5.10.0-051000-generic, LLVM 11.0.0) (0x67df)
Version: 20.2.6
Accelerated: yes
Video memory: 4096MB
Unified memory: no
Preferred profile: core (0x1)
Max core profile version: 4.6
Max compat profile version: 4.6
Max GLES1 profile version: 1.1
Max GLES[23] profile version: 3.2
Memory info (GL_ATI_meminfo):
VBO free memory - total: 3567 MB, largest block: 3567 MB
VBO free aux. memory - total: 4012 MB, largest block: 4012 MB
Texture free memory - total: 3567 MB, largest block: 3567 MB
Texture free aux. memory - total: 4012 MB, largest block: 4012 MB
Renderbuffer free memory - total: 3567 MB, largest block: 3567 MB
Renderbuffer free aux. memory - total: 4012 MB, largest block: 4012 MB
Memory info (GL_NVX_gpu_memory_info):
Dedicated video memory: 4096 MB
Total available memory: 8192 MB
Currently available dedicated video memory: 3567 MB
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
OpenGL renderer string: Radeon RX 570 Series (POLARIS10, DRM 3.40.0, 5.10.0-051000-generic, LLVM 11.0.0)
OpenGL core profile version string: 4.6 (Core Profile) Mesa 20.2.6
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.60
OpenGL core profile context flags: (none)
OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
OpenGL version string: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 20.2.6
OpenGL shading language version string: 4.60
OpenGL context flags: (none)
OpenGL profile mask: compatibility profile
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.2 Mesa 20.2.6
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.20
Comment