Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

23-Way Graphics Card Comparison With Shadow of the Tomb Raider On Linux

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Im getting 35fps on medium-high settings on RX560X which is little more then the article. But thats because of linux-next kernel. 5.5 has some nice optimizations coming in and it can really be seen in games.

    Comment


    • #12
      I must be doing something wrong:

      i7 4790K Stock
      Manjaro Linux
      Linux 5.4 rc7
      16 GB RAM
      RX 580X 8GB
      mesa-aco 19.3 devel

      1080p High Preset no AA:

      Phoronix: 59.4 FPS
      Me: 75 FPS

      1080p Highest Preset no AA:

      Phoronix: 54.9 FPS
      Me: 69 FPS

      Comment


      • #13
        Well at least the 5700XT is probably hindered by no using llvm10 or aco

        R9 3900X with 5700XT on Highest 1080p:
        aco: 116 fps
        llvm: 113 fps

        Comment


        • #14
          Expect some bulk-move enabled benchmarks in a couple of days then! :-)

          Comment


          • #15
            Something amiss with the scores ,

            Manjaro

            All Stock clocked
            3900x
            VII GPU
            mesa ACO
            1080p

            Highest preset no AA

            118 average

            Phoronix has it at 102

            The fact that a 9900k was used @ 5gh should have yielded even better result than what I got I would have thought.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by pete910 View Post
              Something amiss with the scores ,

              Manjaro

              All Stock clocked
              3900x
              VII GPU
              mesa ACO
              1080p

              Highest preset no AA

              118 average

              Phoronix has it at 102

              The fact that a 9900k was used @ 5gh should have yielded even better result than what I got I would have thought.
              That's why.

              Unlike other distributions that focus on LTS versions, Server versions, Paid versions, CLI only, and more in addition to their desktop versions, Manjaro only focuses on their desktops and a minimal CLI installer that's mainly used for getting alternate desktops up and running...stuff not XFCE, KDE, or Gnome.

              Being damn-near bleeding edge and only focusing their attention on desktop usage gives them a slight edge for gaming.

              All that makes Manjaro the quintessential Linux Desktop for Gaming OS.

              Also, there's a very good chance that you're using some AUR packages built with march=native and those really help give Arch & Manjaro a performance edge over most general purpose distributions.

              Comment


              • #17
                Average: 73.53 Frames Per Second
                Maximum: 143.5

                ryzen 2700x @ 4.025GHz 3000mem vegaFE @ 1350/988

                1080P maximum detail no AA

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by pete910 View Post
                  Something amiss with the scores ,

                  Manjaro

                  All Stock clocked
                  3900x
                  VII GPU
                  mesa ACO
                  1080p

                  Highest preset no AA

                  118 average

                  Phoronix has it at 102

                  The fact that a 9900k was used @ 5gh should have yielded even better result than what I got I would have thought.
                  I've finally had some time to sit down and really get to work on my Radeon VII now, I've managed to get an average of 131 FPS at 1080p, highest settings, no AA, using the following:

                  Clocks: 1900mhz core, 1100mhz memory, 1050 mv
                  Mesa: mesa-aco-git 20.0.0_devel.20200115
                  Kernel: 5.4.8-17-tkg-pds
                  Compositor: None running at the time.

                  I'd love to try and push my Radeon VII a little further, but it seems to be unstable when I push either core or memory clocks up from there, and pumping in more voltage doesn't help either.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    I recently decided to upgrade my old R9 290

                    the Vega 64 I tried was 20% less performance (Superposition Benchmark score 1599) than my Under clocked undervolted R9 290 (Superposition Benchmark score 1983)
                    but was more power efficient ~3 watts idle

                    so then tried an RX 570 (Superposition Benchmark score 2780) it out performed my R9 290 by ~ 30% but idled @ 30 watts vs my R9 290 12watts

                    is their a reason why the Vega would be 50% slower than the RX 570 instead of 50% faster ?

                    VGA: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Ellesmere [Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590] (rev ef)
                    OpenGL driver: radeonsi
                    Kernel driver: amdgpu
                    name of display: :0
                    display: :0 screen: 0
                    direct rendering: Yes
                    Extended renderer info (GLX_MESA_query_renderer):
                    Vendor: X.Org (0x1002)
                    Device: Radeon RX 570 Series (POLARIS10, DRM 3.40.0, 5.10.0-051000-generic, LLVM 11.0.0) (0x67df)
                    Version: 20.2.6
                    Accelerated: yes
                    Video memory: 4096MB
                    Unified memory: no
                    Preferred profile: core (0x1)
                    Max core profile version: 4.6
                    Max compat profile version: 4.6
                    Max GLES1 profile version: 1.1
                    Max GLES[23] profile version: 3.2
                    Memory info (GL_ATI_meminfo):
                    VBO free memory - total: 3567 MB, largest block: 3567 MB
                    VBO free aux. memory - total: 4012 MB, largest block: 4012 MB
                    Texture free memory - total: 3567 MB, largest block: 3567 MB
                    Texture free aux. memory - total: 4012 MB, largest block: 4012 MB
                    Renderbuffer free memory - total: 3567 MB, largest block: 3567 MB
                    Renderbuffer free aux. memory - total: 4012 MB, largest block: 4012 MB
                    Memory info (GL_NVX_gpu_memory_info):
                    Dedicated video memory: 4096 MB
                    Total available memory: 8192 MB
                    Currently available dedicated video memory: 3567 MB
                    OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
                    OpenGL renderer string: Radeon RX 570 Series (POLARIS10, DRM 3.40.0, 5.10.0-051000-generic, LLVM 11.0.0)
                    OpenGL core profile version string: 4.6 (Core Profile) Mesa 20.2.6
                    OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.60
                    OpenGL core profile context flags: (none)
                    OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
                    OpenGL version string: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 20.2.6
                    OpenGL shading language version string: 4.60
                    OpenGL context flags: (none)
                    OpenGL profile mask: compatibility profile
                    OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.2 Mesa 20.2.6
                    OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.20




                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X