Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ryzen 7 2700 / Ryzen 7 2700X / Core i7 8700K Linux Gaming Performance With RX Vega 64, GTX 1080 Ti

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ryzen 7 2700 / Ryzen 7 2700X / Core i7 8700K Linux Gaming Performance With RX Vega 64, GTX 1080 Ti

    Phoronix: Ryzen 7 2700 / Ryzen 7 2700X / Core i7 8700K Linux Gaming Performance With RX Vega 64, GTX 1080 Ti

    With the Linux benchmarks of the Ryzen 7 2700 last week I included a few Linux gaming benchmarks, but for those evaluating CPU options for your next Intel/AMD Linux gaming system upgrade, here is a much more thorough set of benchmarks from a wide variety of OpenGL and Vulkan powered Linux games. The Ryzen 7 2700, Ryzen 7 2700X, and Core i7 8700K processors were tested for this Ubuntu gaming comparison while testing with both a Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce GTX 1080 Ti.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=26329

  • #2
    oh wow, the Ryzen is getting a spanking.

    Why is the 8700k beating out the 2700X by so much?

    Comment


    • #3
      Frecuency is more used than cores especially at 1080p

      Intel is ideal cpu for 1080p

      @Michael

      Try make delidd for 5.0ghz or 5.2 on AIO






      Comment


      • #4
        pinguinpc that doesn't explain why the i7 pulls ahead by over 60% in some of the tests. Ryzen isn't nearly as bad for gaming on Windows as it seems to be on Linux. These results are a complete disaster and I wonder if they are any better than what an old FX-8350 would deliver.

        Comment


        • #5
          Very interesting, thanks Michael. Can you please also test at the same frequency to see the IPC improvements?
          ## VGA ##
          AMD: X1950XTX, HD3870, HD5870
          Intel: GMA45, HD3000 (Core i5 2500K)

          Comment


          • #6
            You should test without cpu freq governor in the kernel that slows down Ryzen. Linux kernel is optimised for intel cpus by intel kernel developers that are not test with other cpus.Use only default Bios settings. 400Mhz faster clock in intel cpu is unfair too, so you should down clock that. Ryzen 2700X has more cores and is cheaper, so its better for a gaming/multimedia/sw development PC.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by debianxfce View Post
              You should test without cpu freq governor in the kernel that slows down Ryzen. Linux kernel is optimised for intel cpus by intel kernel developers that are not test with other cpus.Use only default Bios settings. 400Mhz faster clock in intel cpu is unfair too, so you should down clock that. Ryzen 2700X has more cores and is cheaper, so its better for a gaming/multimedia/sw development PC.
              not so much unfair, these products are being bencmarked at stock

              Comment


              • #8
                Kind of interesting, Ryzen seems to perform worse on Linux vs Windows, but Vega 64 seems to perform better (at least in some cases).

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by VikingGe View Post
                  pinguinpc that doesn't explain why the i7 pulls ahead by over 60% in some of the tests. Ryzen isn't nearly as bad for gaming on Windows as it seems to be on Linux. These results are a complete disaster and I wonder if they are any better than what an old FX-8350 would deliver.
                  Frecuency is most determinated, most games dont use core quantity cpu as ryzen

                  However amd have 5ghz as goal too with ryzen 7nm

                  Next year will be interesting in gaming because frecuency is only saves intel on gaming but with ryzen on 5ghz, intel need shows better cpu for 2019 but various questions appear like as:

                  -them choose more frecuency with 10nm ?

                  -better ipc ?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The 8700T/regular/K is a beast of a CPU. Kicks even the previous Extreme Edition, the 6850K. Incredible performance for a great price.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X