Originally posted by debianxfce
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Systemd 234 Released: Meson Build System, Networkd Improvements
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by michalI think that systemd is one of most hated piece of software around. people hated early versions of windows, but it changed over time. systemd is not as controversial as it was at the begining, but still haters circle is large.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Danny3 View PostI would actually be very happy if systemd-resolved coud offer a good replacement for Dnsmasq, since is installed by default on My distro of choice, and allow me to set it in a way that it replies with localhost IP address (127.0.0.1) for every request to a .dev domain.
Dnsmasq does a very good job helping in Web developing with Apache virtual hosts.
I wish systemd-resolved would do this part too, so I don't have to install Dnsmasq server alongside and have 2 servers for the same thing.
Somebody asked if it's possible to do this with systemd-resolved and the answer suggests that it's not possible.
I use Ubuntu for development. And I've build my dev env with using dnsmasq for resolving my dev hostnames, usually it's: <projectname>.dev.net So I set up my own DNS server for getting pro...
And this is what I'm using Dnsmasq for
https://askubuntu.com/questions/2331...e-to-127-0-0-1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daktyl198 View PostAnd as for the whole "UNIX Philosophy" thing, when you show me a perfectly UNIX-like Linux distro, especially one with the speed and most importantly simplicity of a systemd-using Linux distro, then we can talk.
It seems a distro using systemd is pretty damn UNIX-like already.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SilverMachine View PostPeople are still enthusiastic about systemd after this: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...8-root-exploit news? This is exactly the reason I've ignored systemd. Too unsafe by all the functions they added that don't even belong in an init system.
How about we discuss a laughably bad remote privilege escalation bullshit that systemd prevented like for example http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...SQL-Crit-0-Day
that is defeated by 3 lines in the default systemd config of that service? https://www.phoronix.com/forums/foru...332#post897332
Man systemd is so bad, I really need to use busybox's init instead.
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostFYI, might be worth it trying to raise the issue in systemd's github instead than on askubuntu or here. Pottering himself looks at the issues posted in systemd bug tracker, and posts there every now and then, among other developers.
See here for issues opened against systemd-resolved (so you don't open an issue that exists already) https://github.com/systemd/systemd/i...stemd-resolved
Comment
Comment